WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Jamie Raskin says expanded background checks on private firearm sales will be among his priorities as expected House Judiciary Committee chairman.
  • Republicans argue the proposal would burden hobbyists, friends, and people selling firearms from personal collections.
  • Gun rights advocates warn that expanded background checks would create a registry that could enable future confiscation.
  • Raskin also said he would scrutinize antitrust deals and perhaps pursue another impeachment of President Donald Trump.

Democrat Jamie Raskin is putting gun control near the front of the agenda for the incoming Congress, vowing that universal gun registration will be one of his party’s top priorities. While Americans are hearing plenty about affordability, Democrats appear ready to spend their opening burst of energy targeting private firearm transactions.

Raskin moved closer Tuesday to becoming the first Marylander in nearly 200 years to chair the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. The source described him as upbeat while he discussed the post and the issues he would seek to advance from that powerful perch.

His stated list reaches beyond firearms. Raskin said he would also scrutinize antitrust deals and perhaps pursue another impeachment of President Donald Trump, placing several politically charged fights on the committee agenda he hopes to lead.

On guns, Raskin said his priorities would include legislation requiring background checks on private sales, rather than limiting those checks to purchases from licensed dealers. The plan would bring transactions between private citizens into the background check process Democrats want to expand.

Gun Laws Have Changed! Protect yourself by knowing where you can and cannot carry your firearm, so you can travel with confidence.

MORE NEWS: Marco Rubio Torches Wild Exit Rumors With One Perfect Answer [WATCH]

Republicans have argued that such legislation would place unnecessary restrictions on hobbyists and people selling firearms to friends. Their objections also cover owners who want to sell firearms from their personal collections without facing another layer of government involvement.

Requiring background checks on private sales would effectively create a gun registry. From that perspective, a government list is not harmless paperwork, but the first step toward wholesale gun confiscation.

That concern is why critics are not treating Raskin’s priority as a modest adjustment. The proposal would reach hobbyists, friends, and owners selling personal firearms, precisely the people Republicans say would face needless restrictions under the legislation.

The National Association for Gun Rights sounded the alarm on November 5, 2026. It wrote, “Incoming House Judiciary Chair Jamie Raskin promised in an interview that UNIVERSAL GUN REGISTRATION would be one of the Democrats’ top priorities in the upcoming Congress.”

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

The group also emphasized how quickly the issue emerged following the election. “It’s barely been 36 hours. They aren’t waiting. They’re coming after your guns.”

The timing sharpened the criticism because Democrats had barely secured their position before gun restrictions surfaced as a priority. The economic message voters had been hearing: “So much for affordability, folks.”

Kostas Moros delivered the same criticism in even fewer words, writing, “Ah yes, affordability.” The remark captured the view that Democrats were choosing another gun control battle instead of concentrating on the affordability concerns presented to voters.

Reaction from Texas focused on the possible political consequences for newly elected Democrats. The OC Scanner account wrote, “All those new Texas democrats who want to stay in power gonna learn real quick”.

Close

MORE NEWS: “We Will Eat You”: Leftist Minnesota Group Hints at Violence Unless Democrats Prosecute Trump Officials and Oust Leaders

Another account, Iron Brigade, urged Republicans to let Democrats proceed while making the stakes clear to voters. It wrote, “Feds want to make list of gun registration so they can target and confiscate them when they want another intrusion into your constitutional right.”

That response reflects the central warning running through the debate. Gun rights supporters see registration not as an isolated administrative requirement, but as a tool that could eventually be used to identify firearms and their owners for confiscation.

One social media reaction offered an especially direct response to the developing agenda. The FOO wrote, “Buy guns and ammo.” The brief message showed how little confidence some gun owners have in reassurances surrounding expanded background checks or registration.

The proposed approach is unconstitutional, just another attack on Second Amendment rights.

Raskin’s expected committee role would give him a prominent position from which to pursue background checks on private firearm sales. For Republicans and gun rights advocates, that makes the coming congressional fight about far more than paperwork, procedure, or another Washington promise.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.