Kamala Harris’s campaign reportedly spent over $1 billion in just a few months, leaving the campaign in significant debt, according to multiple reports.
The Harris team managed to burn through its entire campaign budget.
Despite massive spending, the Harris campaign remains $20 million in debt.
Jesse Watters ended Kamala’s career last night.
How did they spend $1B and still manage to be $20M in debt? pic.twitter.com/gNMxhXcexP
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) November 9, 2024
Celebrate Trump's Historic 2024 Victory with the Exclusive Trump 47th President Collection!
Donald Trump offered to help them pay it off.
HOLY SMOKES. Trump is now offering to use his leftover funds to pay off the debts of the Harris campaign and DNC. pic.twitter.com/n9XYleXmSP
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) November 9, 2024
Among its high-ticket expenses was a replica set built in Washington, D.C., for Harris’s appearance on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast, a decision reportedly made to avoid flying to the show’s original Los Angeles location.
The costly investment did not translate to substantial engagement, as the interview failed to reach a million views.
FACT: EVERY CELEBRITY (Including Oprah) OR LEFT-WING PODCASTER Who Took Money From The @KamalaHarris Campaign AND DID NOT DISCLOSE THEY WERE A PAID POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENT, BROKE FEDERAL LAW!
Get A Lawyer Now!
The Law Applies To Both Parties & A Trump DOJ MUST Investigate. pic.twitter.com/EWh5yUdcgu— John Basham (@JohnBasham) November 10, 2024
Meanwhile, Harris declined a potential interview with Joe Rogan, a host with a large audience reach.
The campaign also reportedly spent $15 million on celebrity concerts, including performances by Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, and Ricky Martin at a rally on election eve.
While the events were intended to boost enthusiasm, they did not yield a significant increase in voter turnout.
Harris’s campaign also reportedly allocated $1 million to Harpo Productions, Oprah Winfrey’s company, which facilitated a September town hall and an appearance by Winfrey at the rally in Philadelphia.
One Democratic source speaking to NewsNation called the spending spree “remarkable incompetence.”
The source commented, “It takes remarkable incompetence to spend $1 billion in 90 days, lose market share, allow Donald Trump’s election, and end up in debt.”
MORE NEWS: Jill Biden’s Reaction To Donald Trump At Notre Dame Reopening Sets The Internet On Fire [WATCH]
Winfrey recently responded to questions surrounding her involvement in the campaign spending.
When approached by a TMZ reporter on the street, Winfrey was asked about her reported $1 million endorsement fee for Harris.
Winfrey denied the claim, stating, “Not true. I was paid nothing, ever.”
Oprah DENIES Kamala paid her $1M
“Not true… I was paid nothing — ever.” pic.twitter.com/btiyTw2SQe
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 12, 2024
The report does not allege that Winfrey personally profited from her endorsement, only that Harpo Productions was compensated for facilitating the events.
FEC records—which we cited—show Oprah’s production company Harpo was paid the money pic.twitter.com/1j49nNDRgh
— Gabe Kaminsky (@gekaminsky) November 11, 2024
MORE NEWS: Megyn Kelly Exposes Deep State Establishment Plot To Derail Trump’s Cabinet Picks [WATCH]
The Harris campaign’s heavy spending on promotional events and celebrity appearances raises questions about its strategy.
According to the Washington Examiner’s Gabe Kaminsky, these expenditures highlight the campaign’s lack of focus on delivering a clear, impactful message to the American public.
Instead, funds were used for events and initiatives that did not convert into voter support.
Critics point out that instead of focusing on tangible voter outreach and policy messaging, the funds went toward creating high-profile appearances and events that did not resonate with voters, especially those dealing with economic challenges.
Yeah
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 10, 2024
Trump’s campaign, by comparison, relied on fewer employees and lower overhead, focusing on direct voter engagement and managing costs in line with his “America First” message.
MORE NEWS: Naked Teacher Caught With Drugs And Sex Toys In Elementary School Classroom, Attacks Cop [WATCH]
As a result, Trump’s campaign appears to have achieved a more efficient use of resources, while Harris’s high-profile strategy left her campaign in financial turmoil.
As America faces economic strain, this spending by the Harris campaign has drawn scrutiny from political observers and donors, many questioning the financial decisions made by the campaign amidst a backdrop of economic difficulties faced by voters in the Biden-Harris era.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.