Kylie Jenner has entered another ugly legal fight, this time over whether a former private chef can continue pursuing her lawsuit under the name Jane Doe. The woman sued the reality star in June and has kept her actual identity out of the court records, as reported by Page Six.

At the heart of the lawsuit is the woman’s claim that she suffered a devastating miscarriage after being mistreated while working for Jenner. The account presents the alleged workplace treatment and the pregnancy loss as the grim foundation of her case.

Jenner is now pushing to end the anonymity that has shielded her former chef’s name. Her attorneys are asking a Los Angeles judge to require the woman to reveal her real identity in the official court records.

Gun Laws Have Changed! Protect yourself by knowing where you can and cannot carry your firearm, so you can travel with confidence.

The request creates a sharp new conflict within an already nasty legal battle. While the woman brought her allegations to court as Jane Doe, Jenner’s legal team is directly challenging whether she should be permitted to keep using that name.

The former chef’s claims concern her working conditions while employed by the reality star. She alleges that the treatment she experienced during that period was connected to the devastating miscarriage described in her lawsuit.

Jenner’s attorneys are focused on how the plaintiff is identified in court rather than allowing the case to continue with Jane Doe listed in the records. They want the Los Angeles judge overseeing the dispute to force disclosure of the woman’s actual name.

The effort would remove the identity protection reflected in the Jane Doe filing. As the court considers the request from Jenner’s side, the former chef’s allegations remain tied to the name she selected when she sued in June.

The clash over identification adds another intense dimension to allegations that were already deeply personal. The lawsuit combines claims of mistreatment while working for Jenner with the woman’s account of suffering a miscarriage.

Jenner’s latest legal move does not erase or resolve those allegations. Instead, it places the woman’s anonymity at the center of the immediate courtroom dispute and asks a judge to determine whether her real name must appear.

The source account does not provide the former chef’s name, and it continues to refer to her as Jane Doe. It also does not provide a decision from the Los Angeles judge on the request made by Jenner’s attorneys.

No additional details about the alleged working conditions are included in the account. The central claim remains that the woman says mistreatment during her employment for Jenner preceded the devastating miscarriage at the center of her lawsuit.

Page Six presented the dispute as another nasty legal battle involving the reality star. Its accompanying video promises a broader breakdown of other former employees who are also suing Jenner, though the provided account does not name them or describe their individual allegations.

That wider reference places the private chef’s lawsuit among other legal complaints from people identified as Jenner’s former employees. However, the focus of this specific dispute remains Jenner’s effort to expose the identity of the woman currently proceeding as Jane Doe.

The legal maneuver puts Jenner and her former private chef on opposing sides of a highly sensitive identification fight. The woman is pursuing allegations involving her workplace treatment and miscarriage, while Jenner’s attorneys are pressing for her actual name to become part of the record.

For now, the former chef remains identified only as Jane Doe in the account of the case. Jenner’s attorneys have asked the Los Angeles judge to change that, intensifying a legal battle already built around severe claims of mistreatment and personal loss.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.