Former President Barack Obama renewed a longstanding argument about women in political leadership during a recent public speaking engagement at Salem State University in Salem, Massachusetts, saying he believes governments would perform better if women were put in charge.

Obama told the audience that he had considered the idea even during his time in the White House.

“Even when I was president, I sometimes fantasized about if you put uh women in charge of every government for like two years and then just kind of saw, all right, how how how are things going? I have a strong belief that things would they wouldn't be perfect, but they'd be better.”

WATCH:

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

The remarks echoed comments Obama made several years earlier in which he argued that older men remaining in positions of authority were responsible for many of the world’s problems.

During a 2019 event in Singapore, Obama said, “If you look at the world and look at the problems, it’s usually old people, usually old men, not getting out of the way.”

His latest comments again put the question of gender and political leadership at the center of the discussion.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

The argument that more women should hold positions of government power has been a recurring theme in Democratic politics for years, often accompanied by claims that women would bring a different approach to governing than men.

Obama’s comments went further by suggesting that replacing the leadership of every government with women, even temporarily, would produce better results overall.

That argument also raises the broader question of whether gender itself is a reliable measure of how effectively someone will govern.

The United States has had presidents with widely different records, governing styles, and political philosophies, though every president to date has been a man.

A female presidency would similarly depend on the individual officeholder, her policies and her approach to governing rather than gender alone.

The discussion surrounding Obama’s remarks has also included comparisons between prominent women from the two major political parties.

Among Republican women cited as examples of political leadership is Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, while the Democratic Party has elevated numerous women to prominent positions in national and state politics.

Democratic figures frequently mentioned in debates over female political leadership include former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, California first lady Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Rep. Katie Porter, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, and former first lady Michelle Obama.

Other Democratic officials and political figures referenced in the broader debate include New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Stacey Abrams and Katie Wilson.

The discussion has also unfolded alongside controversies involving women in other areas of public life, including debate surrounding female jurors in the Clancy case, allegations involving Alaska Democratic Senate nominee Mary Peltola and controversies surrounding the WNBA.

Supporters of putting more women in positions of power have long argued that greater representation can change political priorities and leadership styles.

Critics of that argument contend that political philosophy, judgment and policy positions are more important than whether a candidate is male or female.

That distinction is especially significant when comparing women across party lines.

Republican and Democratic women often hold sharply different positions on issues including abortion, the Constitution, immigration, taxation, education and the role of the federal government.

Obama’s remarks did not distinguish between those ideological differences. Instead, his statement presented female leadership more broadly as something that would improve government performance.

His comments also fit into a larger political message that has developed over decades around the role of women in public life.

Feminist movements beginning in the 1960s and 1970s pushed for expanded political, professional, and economic opportunities for women, while abortion rights and changing views of the traditional family became major parts of the movement’s political agenda.

Those debates continue today, though the political divide among women themselves remains substantial.

The question surrounding a future female president therefore extends beyond whether a woman would govern differently from a man.

Any woman elected president would bring a specific political agenda, governing philosophy, and set of priorities to the White House.

Obama’s argument is that female leadership would generally produce better results.

The continuing political debate is over whether gender should carry that kind of weight when voters determine who should hold the nation’s highest offices.

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.