Barbara Boyd argued that President Donald Trump used his latest United Nations General Assembly speech to draw a sweeping ideological contrast between his vision of sovereign nation-states and what she described as a globalist system centered on international institutions, climate policy, mass migration and centralized control.

“Here's President Trump in his speech at the UN General Assembly yesterday,” Boyd said before playing a portion of Trump’s address.

“It is deeply ironic that the United Nations has an entire institution, the UNESCO group of people and countries, devoted to protecting cultural heritage. Yet, with their ceaseless promotion of mass migration, these globalists are actively destroying the greatest cultures and most extraordinary heritage in all of history,” Trump said.

Boyd characterized that statement as only one element of a much broader attack on globalization.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

“That was just one shot that Trump took at the globalists in his speech. His entire speech was a searing indictment of globalization, and he did it right at the UN. It is the home of this false religion,” Boyd said.

She contrasted Trump’s approach with Brazilian President Lula da Silva, who defended multilateral institutions and called for renewed international focus on climate policy.

“Ladies and gentlemen, the pillars of multilateralism are being eroded. The World Trade Organization is being kept on life support,” Lula said.

“Weakening the World Health Organization makes everyone more vulnerable.”

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Lula also argued that climate policy needed to return to the center of the international agenda.

“It is time to resume the offensive and inflict a defeat on denialism,” he said.

Trump, by contrast, used his speech to reject warnings surrounding artificial intelligence, which he referred to as superintelligence.

“Every major new technology brings challenges, and superintelligence is no exception,” Trump said.

“Yet the very same people who said we'll all be dead in 12 years because of global warming, a name since reborn to climate change because the planet was cooling, not warming, and nobody was dead. These are the same people that are now saying that AI is going to kill us all, that robots are going to attack us, and that everything is going to be a total disaster.”

Boyd also tied Trump’s international message to developments throughout Latin America, where she argued his administration has pursued a strategy centered on national sovereignty, economic development, and combating narco-terrorist organizations.

“For decades other administrations allowed much of this region to be dominated by vicious gangs and bloodthirsty drug cartels, destabilized by uncontrolled migration, and infiltrated by hostile foreign adversaries, foreign sick, demented adversaries,” Trump said.

“But not anymore, we are reasserting American power including American military power where necessary, in our region and around the world to create a safer future for all of us.”

Boyd said Brazil’s upcoming election could become another major test of the political direction of the hemisphere.

“Lula is facing an election on October 4th, which will determine whether Brazil continues to be the paragon of globalization and socialism in Latin America,” Boyd said.

She then moved to the war between Russia and Ukraine, arguing that Trump is seeking a settlement while European leaders continue to promote a more confrontational approach.

Boyd cited Kaja Kallas discussing what a Russian defeat could mean for the country’s future.

“Russia's defeat is not a bad thing because then, you know, there could be really a change in in the in the society,” Kallas said.

“I think if you would have more like small nations, it's not a bad thing if you if if the big power is actually much smaller.”

Boyd also played comments from Jacob Rees-Mogg warning that Britain could eventually face another major war.

“Possible that in the next few years we may face a war, and if we face a war, we will need people who will join the armed services and who will go out and do their duty,” Rees-Mogg said.

He argued that national survival could ultimately require major sacrifices.

“We may even face circumstances where people have to die to save their country, as they did in the First and Second World Wars and in many other wars before and since,” Rees-Mogg said.

Boyd contrasted that rhetoric with what she described as Trump’s continued attempts to negotiate settlements in both Ukraine and Iran.

She highlighted an exchange between Trump and a reporter about recent contacts with the Iranian delegation.

“Has anyone from your team met with the Iranian delegation, anyone from, or plans to meet with who, or will you say it?” the reporter asked.

“Yeah. Today,” Trump replied.

“How was that conversation, Mr. President?” the reporter asked.

“Went very well. It ended an hour ago. It was a meeting that lasted for 3 hours, and it ended an hour ago,” Trump said.

When the reporter asked what was discussed, Trump described the stakes in stark terms.

“It was a very good meeting. I mean, I must tell you it's very good. I can't imagine why they wouldn't want to do it. It's greatness, potential greatness, or obliteration. Two choices. I mean, it's In one case, it's obliteration, and the other alternative is potential greatness. It could be a great country,” Trump said.

Boyd argued that economic pressure remains central to the administration’s approach toward Iran, pointing to Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s description of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz and the pressure placed on Tehran.

“There's a lot of things not being reported right now about Iran, and it's unfortunate,” Rubio said.

“More oil is coming out for the world, no oil is coming out for Iran, and they are facing increasing, crippling sanctions that are really harming their economy.”

Boyd concluded by returning to Trump’s optimistic view of superintelligence and technological development.

“Americans have never been a nation that retreats from a frontier or shrinks from a challenge, no matter how great or how daunting that challenge may be,” Trump said.

She argued that the administration sees advanced technology as the foundation of another major industrial transformation capable of increasing productivity, rebuilding manufacturing and improving living standards.

Joe Kernan raised one of the largest economic questions surrounding that argument.

“Help our most daunting fear of the 40 trillion and the out-of-control deficits we're running now. This will come under control somehow? You're optimistic?” Kernan asked.

Joe Lonsdale said major productivity gains could dramatically change the fiscal picture.

“Yes. if you get productivity up to 3, 4, 5 percent, which you 100 percent should be able to do with these things, if not significantly higher, that solves the deficit problem,” Lonsdale said. “There's I mean, this is an amazing thing for our civilization. Like this is the answer: is to get growth higher, and it's how everyone gets wealthier is doing more with less. It's going to do it.”

Kernan pressed him on whether those benefits would extend beyond wealthy Americans.

“Everybody's going to get wealthier, or just the cuz only the wealthy have been getting wealthier?” Kernan asked.

“That's not true,” Lonsdale responded.

“I think the most important comparison, let's go back 1870, 1900s, Second Industrial Revolution. The last time productivity shot up a lot, the average American, the average working class American was twice as wealthy in real terms within one generation, and that's what happens when productivity goes up: everyone gets wealthier.”

For Boyd, the competing speeches, wars, technological debates and economic strategies all reflected a larger divide.

“So, the difference between Trump's nation-state system and globalism was on stark and fundamental display yesterday,” Boyd said.

“The culture of our country put forth by the President is one of optimism and daring. America stands ready to conquer the next frontier, to build a better future for ourselves and our posterity.”

WATCH:

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.