Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon lashed out at James O’Keefe and Cam Higby after the pair used concealed cameras to examine the state’s voter vouching system.

Instead of squarely confronting concerns raised by their footage, Simon announced that law enforcement was reviewing their conduct.

The controversy centers on a Minnesota law allowing a registered voter to affirm that another person lives in the same precinct.

That individual may then register at the polling place without producing the standard documentation normally used to prove residence.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

O’Keefe described the rule this way: “Under Minnesota’s Statutes § 201.061, a registered voter can sign an affidavit affirming that they know another individual resides in the same precinct, allowing that person to register at the polls without presenting standard proof of residence. One registered voter can vouch for up to eight people,” O’Keefe said.

That generous allowance was precisely what O’Keefe and Higby set out to test inside Minneapolis polling locations.

“We wanted to find out what this actually looks like inside a polling place and how far election workers would let us take it,” he said.

O’Keefe wore a thobe while Higby appeared in a black burka, with the pair presenting themselves as voters while secretly recording their conversations.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

O’Keefe also used an exaggerated Middle Eastern accent during exchanges with election workers.

“I have a question about the vouching program, yeah? Vouching? I can vouch for them but they are not registered,” O’Keefe asked the poll workers.

His questioning then moved directly toward how many additional people one voter could bring into the process.

“Ahhh good. Can I bring five more” O’Keefe asked the poll workers.

After learning the stated limit, he replied, “Up to eight? Okay, that’s a good thing,” O’Keefe said.

One poll worker explained the procedure in remarkably plain terms.

“If you’re all in the same precinct and you are already registered, you can vouch for them as ID. Eight people,” a poll worker told James O’Keefe.

The explanation became even more striking when the worker clarified the role of the person providing the voucher.

“You’re the ID,” the election worker told O’Keefe, a statement that quickly became central to the dispute over whether Minnesota’s rules contain adequate safeguards.

WATCH:

Simon did not respond by promising an audit, legislative review, or public examination of whether the system could be exploited.

Instead, the Democrat secretary accused the investigators of misconduct, challenged their credibility, and raised the prospect of legal consequences.

In his statement, Simon said O’Keefe and Higby had visited multiple Minneapolis polling places while impersonating Minnesota voters.

He also accused them of using costumes, imitating foreign accents, making false claims about their registration, and publishing what he called a heavily edited video.

“Poll workers immediately reported these visits to local election officials and law enforcement is reviewing the situation,” Simon said.

That declaration turned an undercover investigation into a potential law enforcement matter, while leaving the public debate over vouching largely unanswered.

Simon further declared, “The misconduct by this group is outrageous and totally unacceptable. We have zero tolerance for lying, lawbreaking, and disruptions at our polling places.”

Strong words came quickly from the state’s top election official, but direct answers about possible abuse of vouching were considerably harder to find.

He also defended election workers and said polling locations should remain calm.

“Voters deserve better, as do the tens of thousands of our neighbors and friends who serve as poll workers. Our aim, as always, is to ensure that our polling places are islands of calm. Minnesota laws are there to ensure that outcome.”

WATCH:

O’Keefe and Higby responded to Simon’s warning, with O’Keefe defending the reporting and emphasizing what election officials told him during the recorded encounters.

His central point remained that workers said a registered voter could serve as identification for as many as eight other people.

Minnesota officials may object to the costumes, accents, and hidden cameras, but theatrics do not erase the underlying policy question.

If one person can effectively become the identification for eight others, citizens are entitled to ask what prevents organized abuse and how election officials verify the claims.

Simon’s response appears focused on the messengers rather than the mechanism they examined.

For voters already skeptical of election bureaucracy, threatening investigators while defending an unusually permissive registration practice is not likely to inspire the confidence Minnesota officials insist the system deserves.

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.