WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
- Biazzo Law published a 17 page draft containing seven proposed impeachment articles for the incoming 120th Congress.
- The proposal covers alleged abuses involving immigration, elections, tariffs, federal power, corruption, public trust and military operations.
- The draft leaves the congressional sponsor blank while supplying accusations, resolution language and a demand for Trump’s removal.
- The firm acknowledges pending litigation and directs committees to revise or discard charges unsupported by evidence.
An outside legal proposal has produced a ready made impeachment package for the incoming 120th Congress. Biazzo Law published a 17 page draft containing seven articles against President Donald Trump, complete with language seeking removal from office and disqualification from holding federal office.
The draft appeared at 9:36 p.m. Eastern on November 3, according to the publication timestamp, placing it on election night and nearly two months before the new Congress convenes. It was formatted as a congressional resolution, although spaces remained blank for a sponsoring lawmaker, resolution number, and committee.
The opening declaration was already supplied: “Resolved, That Donald John Trump, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors”. Each article ends by declaring that Trump warrants impeachment, trial, removal, and disqualification from holding an office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
The document is an outside proposal rather than an impeachment resolution accepted by Congress. Its author, attorney Corey J. Biazzo, describes himself as a political independent and is a civil litigation and appellate attorney admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Biazzo filed a friend of the court brief supporting the challenge to Trump’s tariffs in Learning Resources v. Trump. His proposed Article V alleges defiance of the courts and deprivation of due process through immigration enforcement, deportation flights, birthright citizenship restrictions, and federal officers’ shootings in Minneapolis.
The count discusses the removal and prosecution of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Alien Enemies Act deportation flights, and Executive Order 14160. It also alleges immigration agents detained at least 506 U.S. citizens, including 70 minors, while challenging an ICE memorandum concerning entry into homes without judicial warrants.
Article VI alleges corruption of elections. It targets federal conditions on mailed ballots, the Justice Department’s attempt to set aside more than 20,000 California voters’ mailed ballots and $20 million in advertising spending that the document describes as promoting Trump before the midterms.
“In all of this, President Trump sought to tilt the elections by which the people hold him and his party accountable, the conduct the Framers regarded as the gravest ground for impeachment.”
Article VII accuses Trump of usurping the taxing power through tariffs. The proposal invokes the Supreme Court’s rejection of tariff authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and says approximately $166 billion in duties is owed to more than 330,000 importers.
The accompanying investigative plan acknowledges that the original tariffs rested on an arguable interpretation of federal law. It recommends that committees investigate primarily for evidence that Trump deliberately evaded the Supreme Court’s judgment when replacement tariffs were imposed.
Article I combines numerous allegations under an abuse of power charge. It cites the Comey and Letitia James prosecutions, pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, executive orders against law firms, actions involving Senator Mark Kelly, press credentials and the dismissal of FBI personnel.
The named firms are Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale and Susman Godfrey. The proposal also cites the dismissal of nine FBI agents and analysts who worked on the classified documents investigation, while identifying the related lawsuit as pending.
Article II alleges corruption involving Trump’s personal lawsuit against the IRS and Treasury and a proposed $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund. The document acknowledges that the Justice Department rescinded the fund but alleges a release protecting Trump, his family, and his companies from IRS claims remained in place.
Article III alleges betrayal of the public trust through Qatar’s aircraft gift, Trump family cryptocurrency ventures, presidential library land, settlement payments and Jared Kushner’s diplomatic role. The proposal presents those matters as alleged foreign and domestic emoluments violations while expressly marking several supporting lawsuits as pending.
Article IV alleges usurpation of war power and unlawful use of the Armed Forces. It encompasses strikes on vessels, operations in Venezuela, Iran and Yemen, and military deployments in American cities.
The firm acknowledges that its cited litigation includes preliminary rulings, appeals, and unresolved cases. It instructs committees to revise or abandon accusations that evidence does not support, yet invites congressional offices to introduce, adapt or reuse the resolution without permission, licensing or attribution.
The sponsor remains blank, but the accusations and demand for Trump’s removal are filled in. Without the votes to convict, Democrats risk turning two years of impeachment hearings into a costly advertisement for Trump’s warnings about their priorities while families remain focused on insurance premiums, grocery bills and affordability.
President Trump on whether he's worried about impeachment despite huge Democrat House gains:
"Not even a little bit." "I think it would DESTROY the Democrat Party if they did that. Because impeachment for no reason? For what? For having a successful country? Our country is more successful now than at any time in its history." — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 4, 2026
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.