WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Incoming Rep. Don Leonard alleged that senior Democrats threatened political consequences if he refused to support Hakeem Jeffries for Speaker.
  • Leonard said possible consequences involved committee assignments, legislation, future campaign support, and his next election.
  • Bernie Sanders said he would not support Chuck Schumer, while Elissa Slotkin demanded a concrete plan from anyone seeking her vote.
  • House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said he did not know which senior Democrats Leonard was describing.

House and Senate Democrats are wrestling over leadership votes, and the maneuvering is already turning ugly. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the current House Minority Leader, is up for Speaker of the House as members prepare to decide who will lead them.

The Senate has its own brewing leadership mess. Current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wants to become Senate Majority Leader in January, but several figures on the left are throwing obstacles into his path.

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan are among the latest lawmakers questioning Schumer. Their comments add to a growing list of Democrats and left wing members who are not simply falling into line behind the current leader.

When a reporter asked Sanders whether he was a no on Schumer, Sanders answered, “Yes” Slotkin was less direct about her final decision but made clear that any candidate seeking her support would have to earn it.

Gun Laws Have Changed! Protect yourself by knowing where you can and cannot carry your firearm, so you can travel with confidence.

“Whoever wants my vote is gonna have to show me a concrete plan…” Slotkin said. Her response left room for negotiations while putting Schumer on notice that her vote should not be treated as automatic.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland has also reportedly been open to running against Schumer. Another possibility raised in the report was using the prospect of a challenge to secure concessions or agreements from Schumer.

The House contest, meanwhile, has produced a much more dramatic accusation. Incoming Rep. Don Leonard said senior Democrats warned him about what could happen if he refused to vote for Jeffries as Speaker.

According to Leonard, senior members threatened to make his life a “living hell” and ensure that he lost his next election. The claim paints quite a picture of Democratic unity, complete with consequences for anyone unwilling to wear the approved jersey.

Should members of Congress have term limits?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Leonard said Democrats “expect you to wear the team jersey” and “be a good team player." He also argued that the “big D” Democrat Party needed some “little D democracy,” while describing himself as a stubborn “SOB.”

In a later conversation with TMZ, Leonard offered more detail about who allegedly delivered the warnings. He said they were senior Democrat elected officials rather than members of the party leadership.

Leonard described what he heard as “friendly advice” accompanied by “stark consequences.” That is certainly one way to package an ultimatum when the recipient is being warned about his political future.

A TMZ reporter compared the situation to The Godfather movies because of the alleged threats. Leonard indicated that the consequences could affect committee assignments, the ability to pass legislation, and whether he received support when running for office again.

Leonard did not identify the senior Democrats he said had approached him. That left reporters pressing other House Democrats for answers about who might have delivered the alleged message and whether party officials knew anything about it.

Reporters questioned House Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Pete Aguilar about Leonard’s account. Aguilar denied knowing the identities of the senior Democrats Leonard referenced, saying, “I don't know what senior Democrats he's talking about.”

The denials did not resolve the central question raised by Leonard’s account. His allegation describes a party in which support for Jeffries is expected and resistance could come with political consequences involving committees, legislation, and future campaign support.

Democrats now face leadership friction in both chambers, though the disputes are unfolding differently. Schumer is encountering public hesitation and possible challenges, while the House drama includes allegations of private pressure against a new member considering whether to support Jeffries.

For a party fond of presenting itself as democracy’s great defender, Leonard’s call for some “little D democracy” lands with particular force. The fights between the left and the even further left are becoming public, and the popcorn phase may only be getting started.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.