Liam DeBoer is arguing that many political and cultural disputes commonly treated as separate issues are actually connected by a deeper philosophical conflict over whether society preserves structure or moves toward disorder.

DeBoer framed his argument around the concept of entropy, describing life as something that takes in energy and uses it to create increasingly complex forms of organization.

"What you commonly think about as the left or woke is really just an anti-life movement. Stop thinking about their policy positions as separate and start asking what connects them all," DeBoer said.

He began by asking what distinguishes living things from inanimate objects, using that distinction as the foundation for his broader political argument.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

"First, what even is life? What separates this rock from myself or Neo? Well, the universe naturally tends towards disorder. This is called entropy. This rock cannot take in any energy and then use it to build something new," DeBoer said.

He continued by defining life in terms of its ability to use energy to produce structure.

"What makes you, myself, these trees, Neo, alive is the fact that we take in energy and then expend it to create higher orders of structure," he said.

From there, DeBoer connected that concept to political movements that describe themselves as focused on deconstructing existing institutions and traditions.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

"I could end this video by simply saying that leftists self-declare themselves as deconstructionists, i.e., taking a sledgehammer to the foundations of order," DeBoer said.

His argument moves through religion, history, marriage, sexuality, identity politics, taxation, and energy policy, presenting each as an example of what he views as a broader effort to dismantle established structures.

"First, they attack God, which theologically is conceptualized as the essence of order itself, meaning life. They attack the past. They claim that civilization, traditions, our ancestors that created that order are fundamentally oppressive and illegitimate," DeBoer said.

He then turned to marriage and family formation, arguing that traditional marriage represents another form of social organization that creates new life.

"Next, attack marriage itself-a higher-order union between individuals that creates life. Sex is no longer a sacred act for the use of reproduction, but rather becomes a source of personal pleasure. Same-sex marriages are elevated as moral ideals, despite being reproductive dead ends. And the cherry on top, abortion gets marketed as liberation," he said.

DeBoer also criticized intersectionality, saying he believes it encourages people to view relationships between demographic groups primarily through the lens of conflict and power.

"After that, they pit as many people as possible against one another. They call this intersectionality, which means women overthrowing men, certain races overthrowing other races. Every identity marker is now a battle for power," DeBoer said.

Economic policy is another component of his theory. DeBoer characterized progressive taxation as a transfer of productive energy away from individuals and argued that opposition to fossil fuels targets one of the major energy sources supporting modern civilization.

"Then they attack production itself, always pushing for a progressive income tax, meaning the state, an institution that does not create anything, seizes your energy. Cheap and abundant energy, meaning oil and gas, get vilified as threats to life in some evil inversion, despite being the lifeblood of civilization," he said.

DeBoer also connected his argument to abortion and medical assistance in dying, saying both are presented by supporters in terms of individual freedom or autonomy.

"And increasingly, death gets labeled as autonomy. Abortion is freedom, or medical assistance in dying is dignity," DeBoer said.

Rather than debating each issue independently, DeBoer urged people to consider what he sees as the common result of those policies and cultural positions.

"You can argue about each one of these individual policies all you like, but then you're missing the bigger picture. All of them lead to the same place: less energy, less family, less structure, less society, all higher order," he said.

DeBoer concluded that he views the political conflict as something more fundamental than a conventional contest between liberals and conservatives.

"And that's why this is so much bigger than left versus right. Despite the fact that I'll sometimes frame it that way, just because people understand it," DeBoer said.

For DeBoer, the central question is whether society strengthens institutions and relationships that create structure or embraces forces that he believes break those structures apart.

"However, it is about the forces that preserve and create life fighting against the forces that create disorder."

WATCH:

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.