Natalie Winters is raising concerns about a progressive foundation study that examined what it called “property redistribution” as a tool for increasing immigrant inclusion in rural communities, while also pointing to taxpayer-funded refugee housing programs and AI-assisted resettlement efforts in the United States.

Winters said the study, which she described as costing nearly half a million dollars, looked at migrant settlement policies in Italy and examined whether similar approaches could be used in the United States.

"But they're actually studying property redistribution for quote immigrant inclusion in rural America. A nearly half-million-dollar study from this very progressive left-wing foundation was studying how migrants were settled in Italy," Winters said.

She said the project specifically examined cooperative economic structures and redistribution policies intended to improve opportunities for immigrant families.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

"They were examining quote cooperatives, solidarity economy, and property redistribution to improve economic opportunities for immigrant families and their communities," Winters said.

Winters emphasized that the terminology came directly from the study itself.

"I'm not making this up. They're the ones that say property redistribution, and they're basically saying that the United States should take this as an instructive lesson for our refugee policy," she said.

She then connected the study to a refugee housing program in St. Louis that she had previously discussed. According to Winters, the program uses taxpayer-supported assistance to help refugees purchase homes, including matching funds and other forms of financial support.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

"And the real, I think, concerning part in all this to link this back to the story I broke last week about St. Louis, the program that they have going on there, where they're helping refugees buy homes using your taxpayer dollars, they actually point to that program in the study because the government there was giving refugees $2 for every $1 they put down on a house, or just in generally the gift cards, the bus passes-you name it-and they were pointing to this as a prime example of policies that are kind of guided by this idea of property redistribution for immigrant inclusion in rural America," Winters said.

She argued that the idea is not theoretical, but part of an active funding and policy agenda.

"I'm not making that up. That's actually something that the left is actively funding," Winters said.

Winters acknowledged that the Trump administration has moved to reduce some of the funding tied to refugee and immigration programs, but argued that the broader network remains largely intact.

"And to tie this all together, we can say the Trump administration is doing a great job of curtailing a lot of this, which they are. But unfortunately, we know the deep state is very deep. They don't give this stuff up," she said.

She also criticized what she called the “immigrant industrial complex,” arguing that organizations involved in immigration policy have not faced sufficient consequences for their activities during the Biden administration.

"The, you know, immigrant industrial complex, frankly, hasn't really seen any ramifications for its actions under Joe Biden, so why would they stop doing what they're doing?" Winters said.

Winters then turned to Global Refuge, which she described as a technology platform involved in refugee placement across Middle America and connected to an AI-based matching system.

"To that point, Global Refuge, which is this technological platform that actually allows refugees to be plowed into Middle America, it's one of the partners of that AI refugee matching tool I was just talking about," Winters said.

She said State Department funding for the organization had been reduced earlier in the administration, but claimed Global Refuge later secured a new multimillion-dollar grant from the Department of Health and Human Services.

"The State Department cut their funding back, you know, in the start of the administration. But it's really interesting because even though they lost their funding from state not too long ago, they got a new multi-million-dollar grant from HHS," Winters said.

She argued that the new funding was intended to keep refugee resettlement operations running without interruption.

"Which I would posit is probably the roguest of all agencies, particularly when it comes to immigration and facilitating that to ensure quote uninterrupted resettlement operations of refugees in the United States," Winters said.

WATCH:

Winters’ broader argument is that refugee resettlement policy is increasingly being supported by a network of nonprofit organizations, public funding, housing assistance and technology platforms that can continue operating even when one source of federal money is reduced.

She contends that the debate is no longer limited to traditional refugee assistance, but now includes property policy, housing subsidies, AI-assisted placement systems, and long-term strategies designed to reshape immigrant settlement patterns across rural America.

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.