Stephen Miller delivered a sweeping attack on the Democratic Party, accusing its political leaders of embracing policies and alliances that he says favor jihadist interests while undermining American security and the country’s fight against terrorism.

Miller argued that the issue extends from local governments to national foreign policy, pointing to political leaders in New York, Michigan, and Minnesota as examples of what he described as a broader ideological shift inside the Democratic Party.

"Fundamentally, Sean, what we're dealing with here is a Democrat Party from coast to coast that is embracing jihadism," Miller said.

He began by criticizing the mayor of New York City over the response to the October 7 attacks, arguing that the mayor had failed to unequivocally mourn the victims without simultaneously giving political context to what Miller characterized as terrorist violence.

Gold. Upgraded. Buy real gold from $1. Store it in America. Sell it with one click.

"You have, of course, the mayor of New York City that refuses to simply mourn the victims of the October 7th atrocity, without also trying to make a statement justifying the violent resistance, quote unquote, that has taken place by terrorists in Palestinian territory."

Miller then turned to Michigan, where he targeted candidate Abdul Al-Sayyad over his association with Hassan Piker.

"Then you have Abdul Al-Sayyad in Michigan, a candidate who campaigned with Hassan Piker, an openly pro-terrorist, pro-jihad, anti-American extremist who celebrated 9/11."

Minnesota was another major focus of Miller’s criticism. He accused the state’s Democratic political leadership of shielding radicalized members of the Somali refugee community, naming Waltz, Klobuchar, and Keith Ellison while pointing to what he described as a recently thwarted terrorist attack.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

"You have in Minnesota an entire statewide political leadership system, Waltz, Klobuchar, the whole state, Keith Ellison, that continued to shield, protect, harbor, and support the radicalized members of the Somali refugee community, even on the heels of the FBI stopping what would have been a mass casualty terrorist attack by a Somali ISIS supporter at the Mall of America," Miller said.

Miller broadened his argument beyond domestic politics and immigration, accusing Democrats of refusing to support the American government and military in operations against Iran.

"You have a Democrat Party at every single level that refuses to side with the American military, the American president, the American government in combat operations against the Iranian regime, which has spread death, terror, and destruction all over the world."

Immigration policy, however, was central to Miller’s case. He accused Democrats of encouraging migration from areas he described as heavily influenced by jihadist ideology and contrasted that approach with President Donald Trump’s travel restrictions.

"And you also have a Democrat Party that continues to support Islamist jihad migration into every part of this country. When President Trump came into office in his first term, he put a travel ban on terrorist hotspots. The Democrat Party opened the floodgates of those same hotspots. President Trump shut those gates again."

Miller argued that the divide remains active, accusing Democrats of continuing to advocate for refugee admissions from regions he considers security risks.

"But every single day, Democrats are agitating to bring massive flows of refugees from the most pro-jihad areas of the planet into the United States."

His conclusion left little ambiguity about how he views the direction of the Democratic Party.

"The Democrat Party has become, Sean, a jihad party."

WATCH:

Gold is the oldest answer. SoundMoney makes owning it as easy as the apps you already use.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.