U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli made waves this week by confirming what many Californians have long suspected.
During a Sunday interview with KCRA News, Essayli announced that federal investigators have found concrete evidence of voter fraud in California.
He made it clear that the probe is expanding and that criminal charges are expected.
Essayli, a longtime federal prosecutor known for his no-nonsense approach, said his office is investigating multiple cases across the state.
Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement
According to him, the scope of the fraud is still being determined, though evidence is strong enough to refute claims that voter fraud is some kind of right-wing fairy tale.
“There’s a lot of talk in the media that there’s no evidence of voter fraud. So we just wanted to be very clear about that, that there is evidence,” he told KCRA.
“We charged a case just last month of an individual who was paying homeless people to register to vote with fictitious information.”
He explained that his team is already handling several active cases and receiving daily tips from concerned citizens.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
“It’s not just one case. There are multiple cases,” he said, noting that some investigations are ready for prosecution while others are still developing.
Essayli’s candor stood in contrast to the persistent denial from California’s political class and media allies, who reflexively label any mention of voter fraud as “conspiracy theory.”
But that narrative is getting tougher to maintain.
“What I don’t understand is the resistance from leaders, elected officials, and the media to resist looking into these claims,” Essayli stated.
MORE NEWS: Deep Blue NYC: Rent Crisis Hits a New Record as Apartments Slip Further Out of Reach [WATCH]
WATCH:
His office, he insisted, is committed to examining every lead without fear or favor.
The U.S. attorney’s remarks come as frustration mounts over California’s chaotic election system.
Ballot harvesting, lax signature verification, and mail-in voting policies have seeded widespread distrust.
Essayli urged state officials to allow a full audit of recent elections, saying that transparency is the only way to restore public confidence.
So far, the state’s Democrat-dominated leadership has refused.
“An audit is the best way to reassure the public that there isn’t widespread fraud,” Essayli added.
“That’s something that we’ve demanded the state of California comply with, but so far they’ve resisted.”
WATCH:
It seems California’s politicians are more interested in protecting their power than protecting the public trust.
The issue gained new heat after Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt’s questionable loss in the city’s primary election.
Pratt, a Republican who ran a strong campaign and dominated in-person voting, saw his lead evaporate days later as mail-in ballots poured in.
He ended up trailing progressive incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and left-wing City Councilwoman Nithya Raman by roughly 30,000 votes.
Adding to public outrage, videos surfaced of homeless individuals on Skid Row telling reporters they were paid to vote for Bass.
Meanwhile, thousands of Pratt’s supporters reportedly saw their ballots rejected over signature-matching issues.
These revelations stoked doubts about the fairness of Los Angeles elections, already dogged by accusations of corruption and favoritism in City Hall.
Pratt, however, is not backing down.
He recently released a video announcing the beginning of “Phase III” of his political battle, vowing to challenge what he described as a “rigged system” dominated by entrenched progressives and bureaucrats who manipulate rules to stay in power.
WATCH:
His fighting spirit has turned him into a symbol for many frustrated Californians fed up with one-party dominance.
Essayli pushed back against exaggerated claims of “rigged” elections in the literal sense but noted that California’s system “is simply not designed in a way that promotes public confidence.”
The problem, he said, lies in the state’s laws themselves, which are riddled with loopholes that practically invite misconduct.
It is hard to dispute that point. California’s leadership has spent years weakening election integrity measures under the banner of “accessibility.”
From automatic voter registration to vote-by-mail for all, Democrats have constructed a system that prizes convenience over accountability.
The result is a voting process nearly impossible to audit and ripe for abuse.
Predictably, the state’s political elites and their media enablers are doing everything they can to shut down any discussion of fraud.
The same politicians who claim to defend democracy suddenly have no appetite for transparency when their own elections are under scrutiny.
And the press, which should be demanding accountability, is instead parroting the official line that everything is fine.
Essayli’s announcement punctures that illusion.
Federal investigators have found concrete cases of wrongdoing, and more charges are expected.
If wrongdoing is proven on a larger scale, California could be facing a crisis of legitimacy that the dominant Democrat regime will find hard to spin away.
While the politicians and pundits scoff, ordinary Californians are watching closely.
Many know exactly what they have seen in their own communities, questionable ballot harvesting, shady registration drives, and elections decided long after Election Day.
The question now is whether the system will finally be forced to clean itself up or whether the corruption will continue to fester.
One thing is certain: Bill Essayli has lit a match under California’s political establishment.
Whether state officials want to admit it or not, the investigation is moving forward, and truth will eventually catch up with those who have tried to bury it.
The Real MOU: What Trump’s Iran Agreement Actually Says – Truth Thursday | EP 677
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
It sure would be nice to see some uppity politician become a resident of a crowbar hotel and serve some HARD time.
There is a simple answer to getting rid of those that are part of vote fraud, the problem is the corrupt within government and our courts that legalize the fraud. Fines clearly don’t work because a huge part of FRAUD is finding ways to STEAL TAXPAYER DOLLARS. the “FINE” has to be one that sends fear, sends a clear message and is binding to the INDIVIDUALS that choose to commit fraud. That “FINE” should be losing their AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP.
At one point, we had COMMONSENSE just through the OATH OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP. Those that violated it, LOST THEIR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP (no right to legally be here, no right to vote, no right to run for any office, no right to own property, land, businesses, etc…and NO RIGHT FOR ANY ASPECT OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS OR ASSISTANCE FEDERALLY OR STATE-WISE.
If you CANNOT abide by the Oath of American Citizenship, you should LOSE YOUR AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP and “Dual Citizenship” needs to be abolished.
Take away the aspect that those who want to create chaos will use fines as a way to keep the corrupt in place. Taking away their RIGHT TO VOTE, RIGHT TO BE HERE, RIGHT TO OWN PROPERTY,LAND,BUSINESSES and their RIGHT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY, PUBLIC HOUSING, FOOD STAMPS, GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE, ETC IS THE KEY WE USE TO HAVE COMMONSENSE. Today, commonsense has been replaced by those that blame tools used by good and evil people, not eliminating evil people.
GUNS were never the problem. Getting back to simple EQUAL JUSTICE and REAL ACCOUNTABILITY that we had ROADBLOCKS and PROTECTIVE LAYERS to even allow that value to visit America, let alone live here.
As a software engineer involved in securing data communications, I get really pissed off at people who associated hard proof that is completely based upon thinking the worst. The fact that you launch 1000’s of investigations, does not mean that any of the cases will yield anything, and it doesn’t mean that people have to doubt what many professionals efforts have been doing to assure the elections are secure. Trump says there must be fraud because it takes so so long to process the ballots – well maybe it takes so long to count the ballots because of the number of precautions we take to make sure there isn’t fraud. California ballots are processed by both humans and electronic scanning.. they are double verified and they can anyone can go to one of the ballot counting facilities and watch the process… In the 2020 elections, Trump accused someone who was sharing a package of gum, of using a USB stick to steal the election. How gullible can you be. The ballot envelopes are encoded so we can verify the voter only votes once (and the State of CA actually texts each voter when the ballot is received and when it was counted). Essayi claims that there is credible evidence and doesn’t cite it… the fact that the current federal government has investigators trying to find fraud does not mean it must be there.. The Trump administration is doing its best to convince the electorate there is fraud simply by starting all these investigations… but like to 2020 voter investigations – they didn’t amount to anything… and won’t amount to anything. Think to yourself people, is it worth going to jail to place or two extra votes…
By the way – the “Mules” movie of past as a crack-up, I actually watched it, and those people thought that all these people were harvesting votes centering around specific harvesting point when what was actually going on was the cell signals of all the voters, where being centralized around the locations where the cell towers were… where everybody’s signals were sent because cell towers are shared between everyone.. there was no fraud… and yet 10000 mules or whatever it was… felt that the concentration of cell signals must mean their was harvesting going on..
“like to 2020 voter investigations – they didn’t amount to anything” They did, and they will continue to steal unless voter rolls are wiped clean. Paper ballots forensically analysed don’t lie, That’s why they don’t allow anyone to touch them with a ten-foot pole. Only exeption was Maricopa AZ and the proof there via forensic analysis was irrefutable but was never allowed in court.