Susan Miller, a retired senior counterintelligence officer for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), has had her full security clearance revoked by the Trump administration.

Miller has publicly claimed to have played a key role in producing the 2016 U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that examined alleged Russian interference in the presidential election and asserted that Russia favored Donald Trump.

Two Trump administration officials confirmed the revocation to Just The News.

Both officials cited Miller’s ongoing defense of the ICA’s findings despite the release of records questioning its conclusions.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

MORE NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Immigration Authority Despite Liberal Meltdown [WATCH]

“This woman totally shouldn’t hold a high level security clearance after pushing the Russia Hoax. All she did was lie to the American people to hurt Trump,” a senior Defense official alleged.

Another senior Trump official added, “Russian Hoaxers sought to undermine President Trump’s entire first term in office. A woman involved in the Russia Hoax cannot be trusted with a security clearance. Therefore, it has been revoked.”

Miller has used podcasts and video interviews to defend the ICA’s conclusions, reiterating her belief that her team found evidence Russia preferred Trump in the 2016 election.

However, records released in July by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard indicate the ICA team was aware at the time that there was no evidence of “a decisive Russian preference” for Trump.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Gabbard questioned the logic of the ICA’s conclusion, noting that according to a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, the Kremlin may have held damaging information on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

The report stated that Russia was expected to release the material only if Clinton won the election.

Miller has stood by her defense of the ICA, which became the foundation for multiple years of investigations into alleged collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

However, her account of her role in producing the assessment has been disputed.

Close

MORE NEWS: Bob Iger Defends Disney’s Suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Over His Charlie Kirk Remarks [WATCH]

A whistleblower identified as a senior CIA analyst and ICA team member told Public that Miller “had no role in the ICA.”

This contradicts her statements on the “SpyTalk” podcast, where she claimed to have been a central figure in drafting the team for the ICA.

“Members of Miller’s analytic team participated in the ICA, but she had zero role,” the whistleblower said, adding that then-CIA Director John Brennan was instrumental in producing the assessment.

The ICA, published in January 2017, concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign aimed at undermining public faith in the U.S. democratic process and damaging Clinton’s candidacy, with a stated preference for Trump.

The report became a central element in subsequent congressional and special counsel investigations.

Miller’s clearance revocation marks a significant step by the Trump administration in reexamining the roles of intelligence officials tied to the Russia investigations.

While she remains recognized in intelligence circles, including being listed as an awardee for the International Spy Museum’s Women Intelligence Trailblazers award, the loss of her clearance effectively ends her ability to access classified information in any official capacity.

The Real MOU: What Trump’s Iran Agreement Actually Says – Truth Thursday | EP 677