The Trump administration secured a significant legal win on Saturday when the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay in several consolidated lawsuits challenging the administration’s restructuring of a federal media agency.
The decision not only paused lower court rulings against the administration but also laid out a clear framework for how future legal challenges should be evaluated.
At the center of the dispute is Executive Order 14238, signed by President Donald Trump on March 14, 2025. The order directed the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) to reduce its operations to the statutory minimum.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE win from Trump Administration and D.C. Circuit enters stay of lower court injunction. Lower court barred Trump Administration from managing Voice of America. D.C. Circuit stayed decision allowing Trump to move forward w/ firings/grant terminations. 1/
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 3, 2025
Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
USAGM oversees federally funded broadcast entities, including Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Asia (RFA), and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN).
In response to the order, USAGM placed over 1,000 employees on administrative leave, terminated nearly 600 personal-service contractors, and ended fiscal year 2025 grant agreements with RFA and MBN. The agency also instructed VOA personnel abroad to suspend broadcasting.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
Soon after, multiple lawsuits were filed by USAGM employees, contractors, and grantees.
In one of the lead cases, Judge Royce Lamberth of the D.C. District Court issued a preliminary injunction compelling the administration to roll back its actions.
Specifically, the injunction required USAGM to reinstate employees and contractors to their pre-March 14 status, restore FY 2025 grants to RFA and MBN, and ensure that VOA remains a “consistently reliable and authoritative source of news.” Similar injunctions were issued in related cases.
The Department of Justice appealed those rulings, and the D.C. Circuit granted a stay pending the outcome of the appeal.
In its opinion, the appellate court took the opportunity to clarify jurisdictional limits and remind district courts of the proper legal standards.
The court emphasized three key points:
- First, that disputes over personnel actions fall under the jurisdiction of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
- Second, that disputes over federal grant terminations belong in the Court of Federal Claims, not district courts.
- Third, that issuing broad injunctions without requiring plaintiffs to post a bond could result in irreparable harm to the government.
The ruling comes after a wave of legal challenges filed against President Trump’s efforts to reduce the size and scope of the federal bureaucracy since returning to office in January 2025.
The administration has issued a number of executive actions aimed at limiting government overreach and restructuring federal agencies.
Many of these moves have been met with immediate lawsuits in federal court, often resulting in injunctions that temporarily block implementation.
Legal observers note that Saturday’s appellate decision sends a strong message to lower courts.
By reinforcing jurisdictional boundaries and requiring adherence to established procedural rules, the D.C. Circuit reminded judges that their role is to interpret and apply the law—not to function as political counterweights to executive policy.
The Trump administration hailed the decision as a step forward in restoring constitutional balance and limiting judicial overreach.
The Department of Justice has not yet issued an official statement but is expected to argue the case on appeal in the coming months.
Legal analysts anticipate that the decision could influence how other courts handle similar lawsuits brought against the administration’s policy changes, particularly those concerning executive authority over federal staffing and grantmaking.
As litigation continues to unfold across the country, the D.C. Circuit’s ruling will likely serve as a foundational reference point for federal judges, attorneys, and litigants navigating disputes over the reach of executive power.
Connect with Vetted Off-Duty Cops to Instantly Fulfill Your Security Needs
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
And now! if we can get the rogue judges to admit they are NOT members of the administrative branch, and have n o business making those types of rulings. In fact! If John Roberts would get off his fat A** and get American judges back into the judiciary, perhaps the country will again have a government of separate powers – like the Constitution requires.
It would be fantastic if indeed Justice Roberts would take true leadership in bringing down the rouge justices in the judiciary to get back to ruling on the law and not blocking the executive branch’s ability to reduce the size and scope of our government. Trump has been attacked for the last three months since he took office, fighting the leftist deep state, the entrenched leftover government employees who want to continue to spend money and protect their own personal divisions of government that is bloated and needs reorganization or closed down. Seems Elon Musk and Donald Trump have been fighting an uphill battle to reduce the size and scope of government and the fact that the media, intrenched leftist bureaucrats trying to stop his every move is one thing, but the interference of the justice department is almost the last straw. America wants change, get back to constitutional values and the bill of rights. We voted for change and change is what we expect.
In a real democracy, government is elected and NOT appointed. In America the very meaning of the word “democracy” has been and continues on a daily basis, to be debased.
To most outsiders democracy is a desirable condition in which every individual enjoys an equal “Say” or “Vote” as to who governs the daily life of every “Citizen”.
This perhaps explains the daily renewal of astonishment at the activities of virtually ALL of one specific political party which has the temerity to even include the word “democrat” in its name whilst patently rejecting the actual reality of a democratically-elected “Administration”.
On the other hand, it becomes daily clearer just “Who” believes they have the God-given right to “Govern” without ever being elected.
Build more JAILS ! Then use them. America deserves better.
SCOTUS should be the body that sets the rules to rein in these political hacks who masquerade as Federal judges. Chief Justice Roberts must be compromised in some way by the Left for not taking decisive action several years ago when these same ‘judges’ tried to put Trump in prison. This IS a Constitutional crisis that needs to be rectified now!