On Monday, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen issued a temporary injunction against the Trump administration’s decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans living in the United States.

This ruling comes just one week before these protections were scheduled to expire on April 7.

Judge Chen’s decision effectively halts the termination of TPS for Venezuelans, allowing them to maintain their legal status and work permits in the U.S. for the time being.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Do you think we should keep sending the National Guard into cities where crime is out of control?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

In his ruling, Chen expressed concerns about the broad implications of terminating TPS, stating that such a move could severely disrupt the lives of Venezuelan beneficiaries and harm the U.S. economy.

“The Court finds that the Secretary’s action threatens to: inflict irreparable harm on hundreds of thousands of persons whose lives, families, and livelihoods will be severely disrupted, cost the United States billions in economic activity, and injure public health and safety in communities throughout the United States,” Chen wrote in his opinion.

Chen also criticized the government’s failure to present any significant countervailing harm from continuing the TPS protections for Venezuelans.

He argued that the Trump administration’s actions were likely unauthorized by law and based on “arbitrary and capricious” reasoning, possibly motivated by unconstitutional animus.

Due to these concerns, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ request to temporarily postpone the termination of TPS while the legal case is further litigated.

As a result of the injunction, the 350,000 Venezuelans who were set to lose their work permits and protection from deportation next week can continue to live and work in the U.S. while the case moves through the courts.

The battle over TPS for Venezuelans began earlier this year when the Trump administration announced plans to end the program, citing national security concerns and arguing that Venezuela’s improving conditions, such as lower crime rates and better healthcare, made it safe for recipients to return.

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, who defended the decision, also argued that TPS had exacerbated the U.S. border crisis and had allowed individuals associated with criminal gangs, like the Tren de Aragua, to remain in the country.

“The termination was part of the Trump administration’s broader crackdown on illegal immigration,” Noem said in February.

“TPS had become a tool for facilitating illegal immigration, and the conditions in Venezuela no longer warranted the continuation of the program.”

However, in response to the administration’s move, Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James, along with 17 other state attorneys general, filed a legal challenge in early March.

The group argued that ending TPS for Venezuelans would lead to severe consequences, including the loss of legal work status and exposure to deportation.

The coalition submitted an amicus brief in federal court, asserting that over 600,000 Venezuelans hold TPS in the U.S., and terminating the protections would cause irreparable harm to these individuals and their families.

James and the other state attorneys general have criticized the Trump administration’s actions, claiming that the termination of TPS was unlawful and would disproportionately impact Venezuelans who have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.

“This attempt to end the program for Venezuelans is dangerous, and it must be stopped,” James said in a statement.

The legal battle over TPS for Venezuelans continues as the case progresses through the courts, with the latest ruling providing temporary relief to those who would have been affected by the policy change.

The decision underscores the ongoing tension between state and federal governments over immigration policy and the future of the TPS program.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.