The Trump campaign’s ground game is turning heads, and not in the usual way. Whoever came up with this latest strategy is clearly working on a level that’s fresh and unconventional.

By zeroing in on progressive households displaying “Harris/Walz” yard signs, a series of targeted postcards have made their way to these homes, creating an unexpected wave of reactions, as reported by Twitchy.

Celebrate Trump's Historic 2024 Victory with the Exclusive Trump 47th President Collection!

The message? If they’re so in favor of open borders, perhaps they should consider opening their doors to some of those crossing. This bold move hits right at the heart of a common hypocrisy: left-leaning voters often advocate for border policies they don’t personally have to live with.

Their message is simple: if you support policies that allow unfettered border access, then why not extend a personal welcome to some of the new arrivals?

It’s a wake-up call to many. While it’s easy for some to back candidates who champion an “open border” approach, they rarely imagine facing the direct implications. But here’s the catch: now that their supposed ideals are being tested, many are caught off-guard.

Do you think the economy will come back roaring quickly when Trump takes office?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Watching voters stammer through reasons for not being able to welcome strangers into their homes—”We have a two-year-old,” “There’s no room”—reveals how far words can be from reality.

For them, the thought of actually dealing with an influx at their own front doors seems unimaginable, yet they’re more than willing to advocate for a policy that could have the same impact on countless American communities.

For years, the left has positioned themselves as the compassionate side of the immigration debate, deeming any opposition as inherently racist or xenophobic. But when confronted with the possibility of personal responsibility, they’re scrambling to explain why this might not be so practical after all.

At its core, this campaign tactic exposes a glaring inconsistency in progressive rhetoric. Voters who stand behind open border policies are now being asked to live up to the ideals they so vocally support—or at least consider what that support might look like if taken to a more personal level.

With the border crisis now more relevant than ever, this strategy isn’t just clever; it’s holding people accountable to the very principles they claim to champion.