Tucker Carlson is pulling the curtain back on what he calls the “media creation” of Vice President Kamala Harris, claiming her rise is entirely due to media manipulation rather than any real political talent or public support.

In The Daily Caller’s new documentary, “Cleaning Up Kamala,” Carlson takes aim at how mainstream outlets have gone to extreme lengths to present Harris as a competent leader, despite a lack of genuine popularity or clear policy goals.

Carlson doesn’t hold back, stating that Harris is nothing more than a puppet of the press. “She’s purely a media creation,” he says, suggesting that without the constant support from networks like NBC, CNN, and The Washington Post, Harris would not be where she is today.

Patriotic beachwear for freedom lovers! Shop now and get 10% off with code RB10. Vet & LEO-founded.

He notes the irony that this media push for Harris comes at a time when these same outlets are losing credibility with the public.

The mainstream media, according to Carlson, still holds the power to create a “virtual reality” around certain figures, and Harris is their latest project. “It’s interesting because it’s happening at exactly the moment that the media’s credibility and business model are both collapsing,” he explains. Despite their own struggles, these outlets are trying to reshape Harris’s public image into something she isn’t.

Has Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris swayed your vote?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Polls consistently show that Americans have little trust in the media, with a majority viewing them as biased and dishonest. According to a Rasmussen poll, nearly 60% of likely voters agree with the statement that the media is “the enemy of the people,” as reported by Daily Fetched.

Despite this growing distrust, the media continues its effort to prop up Harris, pushing narratives that suggest she is a moderate and capable leader, while ignoring her numerous failures and lack of real support.

Carlson emphasizes that the media’s strategy isn’t just about lying outright but using what he calls “semantic backdoors” to create false impressions. This technique involves inserting technically true statements into broader, misleading narratives, distorting the truth about Harris’s qualifications and leadership skills.

The result is a carefully constructed image that doesn’t reflect reality but has been repeated enough times to become accepted by some as “common sense.”

Harris, who has often struggled to connect with voters and define her political platform, benefits from this media strategy. However, Carlson argues that her lack of genuine policy positions or values makes her a hollow figure.

“She believes in nothing,” he says, describing her as a politician willing to say whatever it takes to climb the ranks. Yet even with the media’s help, Harris struggles to appear authentic, often coming across as disingenuous and unprepared.

Carlson’s sharp critique of Harris challenges the carefully polished image that the media has built around her.

In his view, Harris’s rise to prominence is not due to her own efforts or talents but is instead a product of the media’s desperation to promote someone they can control. He warns that as long as these media-driven narratives continue to dominate, the public will be fed a false version of reality.

While it remains to be seen whether this narrative shift will impact Harris’s perception among voters, one thing is clear: the media’s manipulation of her image is unlikely to hold up under scrutiny. Carlson’s revelations are sure to spark conversation among conservatives and anyone skeptical of the mainstream press.