There’s been a lot of buzz lately about the ABC News debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. One question in particular is raising eyebrows: Did Harris’s team receive the debate questions in advance?

While Harris appeared shaky at the start, she found her rhythm quickly, especially after Trump took the bait on a dig about rally sizes. That moment allowed Harris to steer the conversation away from more critical topics like inflation and immigration, which could have easily sunk her.

Instead of addressing these pressing issues, she spouted her usual word salad and never truly answered the questions posed by moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis, as reported by Townhall.

Trump Fighting For America Collectable Gold Coin - Fight! - Must See

Interestingly enough, while Trump faced live fact-checking—riddled with the usual mainstream media spin—Harris was given a pass. No hard questions, no fact-checking for her mountain of falsehoods.

Now, a whistleblower from ABC News claims to know why: Harris’s team not only received the questions beforehand, but they were also assured she wouldn’t be fact-checked by the moderators. If this turns out to be true, ABC News may find itself at the center of a major scandal.

I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions…

— Black Insurrectionist–I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS (@DocNetyoutube) September 12, 2024

This wouldn’t be the first time Democrats have played this game. In 2016, CNN contributor Donna Brazile handed Hillary Clinton debate questions in advance. That scandal cost Brazile her job. Now, the same kind of interference might be happening with Harris, as there’s growing evidence suggesting the deck was stacked in her favor.

Critics of the debate say the moderators were blatantly biased, giving Harris a free pass while hammering Trump. The LA Times even admitted that Muir and Davis seemed to be working overtime to prevent a Biden-style meltdown from happening on stage.

*If* this is true, it is election interference and disqualifying to be President.

Party doesn’t matter.
Candidate doesn’t matter. https://t.co/6gzusLuH8U

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) September 12, 2024

I said the reason for how the moderators behaved in the ABC debate was simply because they were not going to let happen to Kamala Harris, what happened to Joe Biden and here she is admitting ithttps://t.co/8uwshNkQl7 pic.twitter.com/x48TIQrz18

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) September 12, 2024

Despite the apparent bias, Harris’s performance did little to boost her popularity. In fact, her poll numbers remain stagnant.

As reported by various sources, there’s also growing frustration from Democrats themselves. A former Clinton pollster was appalled by the conduct of the moderators and the overall handling of the debate. It seems no one, not even those on the left, is happy with how things went down.

If these allegations about Harris receiving the debate questions in advance are proven true, it could blow the lid off of ABC News and expose a level of media interference that should concern every American. The mainstream media has long been accused of protecting Democrats, and this would only add fuel to the fire.