Pelosi Reportedly Shuts Down Impeachment Push After Mueller’s Capitol Hill Testimony

The House speaker appears to be at odds with other senior Democratic colleagues

Image Credit: YouTube, MSNBC

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) reportedly shut down an effort by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) to draft articles of impeachment following Wednesday’s testimony by former special counsel Robert Mueller.

The pair appear to have watched two completely different events.

Nadler, in a closed-door meeting, was seemingly excited about the prospect of pursuing impeachment, despite the fact that Mueller’s testimony was widely panned as an undeniable disaster for Democrats.

MORE NEWS: Why the riots?

Related: The 25 Most Incredible Reactions to Mueller’s Testimony

Nadler, according to sources for Politico, “suggested that several House committee chairs could begin drafting articles of impeachment against Trump.”

When do you think the country should re-open and get back to work?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Pelosi, meanwhile, wasn’t impressed with the Mueller circus, saying the idea was still premature.

MORE NEWS: How should Christians handle the murder of George Floyd and where do we go from here?

The New York Democrat pushed back, noting that low poll numbers existed for Nixon’s impeachment but rose as the process continued.

He suggesting that they could use articles already filed by Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) as a framework.

Sherman introduced his unhinged call for impeachment on the House floor in July of 2017, having drafted them well before that.

Those articles accused Trump of violating “his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of president of the United States” and having “prevented, obstructed and impeded the administration of justice during a federal investigation.”

Related: Mueller’s Testimony Was a Dud for Democrats

That seems like an odd basis to use, especially considering Mueller testified that he could not come to that same conclusion.

“Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction?” Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) asked.

“We did not make that calculation,” responded Mueller.

Additionally, Mueller was sure to shut down Democrat Hakeem Jeffries’ allegation of obstruction, responding, “I’m not supportive of that analytical charge.”

From that, according to The Daily Mail, Nadler “suggested having several of the Democratic committee chairmen get started on a draft of impeachment articles when Pelosi shot him down.”

Pelosi, who once said she preferred jail time for President Trump over impeachment, insisted they could not move forward until Democrats had a stronger argument.

“My position has always been: Whatever decision we make in that regard would have to be done with our strongest possible hand, and we still have some outstanding matters in the courts,” she asserted in a press conference following the Mueller circus.

As Bill Maher recently said to the Democrats months ago, “It just looks like you’re stalking him” — meaning Trump.

This piece originally appeared in The Political Insider and is used by permission.

Read more at ThePoliticalInsider.com:
Returns Are In: Mueller Hearing Nothing Short of a Disaster For Democrats
Ivanka Trump Is Slammed By Liberals For Giving Her Daughter A White Dog
Trump Administration Rule Proposal Will Cut 3 Million People Off Food Stamps

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.

The Political Insider publishes the authentic conservative voices of political insiders and award-winning contributors who believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Each one is committed to combating the overwhelming liberal bias in today’s media to give you, the reader, the unedited facts on real issues.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.