If Dinesh D’Souza’s latest movie, 2000 Mules, doesn’t convince you the 2020 election was wholly corrupted, you are either a radical, leftist Democrat or a swampy, squishy Republican. The insufferable smarm oozing from pundits immediately following the 2020 election, “the cleanest in history,” was vomit-inducing. Now, we’re learning our instincts—and commonsense—were right. 2020 was a dirty election—filthy, really.
Lending credence to the “deep state’s” existence, President Donald Trump’s own Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Chris Krebs, even after all of the glaring political and alleged criminal mischief seen by voters—on TV news—during the 2020 election, stated, “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history,” according to VOA News.
Even setting aside the massive anomalies, how could Krebs or his agency know the election was “the cleanest?” As D’Souza points out, without comparing the 2020 election to previous elections, no one can make that conclusion, which is merely an ideologically driven opinion?
It’s no mystery why President Trump fired Krebs. For one thing, just as an ostensibly professional head of a federal agency, shouldn’t he have backed up such a statement with some facts? Without any investigation, Krebs concluded an election with voting irregularities viewed by millions of Americans with their own eyes, occurring in real-time, was indisputably “the most secure.” How does that work?
But Americans must not put aside the massive fraud that D’Souza reports happened in 2020. The questions D’Souza asks in 2000 Mules are good ones that deserve answers. Katherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, of True the Vote, are getting some of those answers.
Just for this discussion, let’s go ahead and back burner the myriad other niggling questions about how a mentally decrepit, non-campaigning Joe Biden could possibly have “won” the election and focus on just one aspect: ballot trafficking.
In developing terminology for their research, Engelbrecht and Phillips noticed how much the election fraud they were finding resembled how a drug cartel operates. So, they decided to slap the moniker “mule” on the 2000 people (conservative estimate) they found who, rather than collecting and delivering drugs, allegedly collected ballots from Democrat-supporting NGOs and delivered them in bulk to multiple official ballot boxes over multiple days.
The task involved an ingenious use of a colossal amount of cellphone data True the Vote purchased. The largest data collection on the 2020 presidential election anywhere in the world. In fact, 2000 Mules introduced me to the word petabyte (I’m still getting used to gigabyte). A petabyte is 1,024 terabytes or 1 million gigabytes. That shows the sheer volume of the data purchased, researched, and utilized by True the Vote.
True the Vote used the same satellite technology the military and law enforcement use to match individual cellphone pings (locations) with its proximity to Democrat NGOs and ballot drop boxes. Then they began the process, which continues, to further match the traffickers to millions of minutes of official ballot box surveillance video.
This information provided a dynamic map of the illegal ballot trafficking that I’m convinced occurred during the 2020 election, especially in swing states. Engelbrecht and Phillips, using a baseline protocol for qualified “traffickers,” those with a minimum number of NGO and ballot box visits, arrived at a conservative 2,000 mules.
According to Republican Party News, “In the newest trailer for the film, Greg Phillips from True the Vote says, ‘We identified in Atlanta 242 mules that went to an average of 24 drop boxes. In Philadelphia alone we’ve identified over 1,100 mules.’”
“He also said that True the Vote has four million minutes of surveillance video from around the country allegedly showing mules in action during the 2020 election.”
The radical left which is opposed to anyone making up their own minds about this information has factchuckers stating the movie’s claims are “faulty.” Not, false, but faulty. They question the cellphone and satellite data. However, Engelbrecht counters that the U.S. military and law enforcement use the same data, and the U.S. Supreme Court has cited this technology as extremely accurate in one of its decisions. She says the GPS data is accurate to 12 to 18 inches.
She mentions how True the Vote’s data helped Atlanta law enforcement make two arrests in the shooting murder of an 8-year-old girl. You will not hear about these aspects of the technology described in 2000 Mules in the legacy media or from the Democrat Party.
New York Post columnist and author of Laptop from Hell Miranda Devine watched the movie. She wrote that D’Souza’s movie “proves ‘the most compelling evidence to date’ of a systematic scheme to undermine the electoral process of our country.”
Surprised the Democrat Party is fighting back against the massive evidence dump in this movie? Don’t be. They no longer represent people who want to live in a constitutional democratic republic. Laws they don’t like mean nothing to them. That’s why the GOP is currently fighting to get the Democrat administration to enforce laws protecting Supreme Court justices from threats and harassment.
Dems enforce laws to beyond their full extent when they don’t like the perpetrators. But they refuse to enforce the law against the deep state, media, academia, political, and corporate allies. Not only do they not follow U.S. immigration law but also, they break it.
And now, their radical allies have doxed conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices and, as alluded to above, have marched on their homes in clear violation of federal law. But like a third-world banana republic, the man living in the White House and his Attorney General couldn’t be bothered to enforce the law. Their still too busy gaslighting about Jan. 6th.
Think about that. Joe Biden and Merrick Garland’s primary responsibility is to protect Americans’ safety and constitutional rights, but instead, they flip off the Supreme Court. Justice Clarence Thomas has made public statements that he will not be intimidated.
So, I have to ask. Where are the four liberal justices speaking out for their conservative colleagues? Justices Kagen, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts should be shouting their support for their conservative colleagues from every mountain top.
The “big reveal” in 2000 Mules, which documents the evidence, compiled using restrained methodologies, shows enough illegal ballots were cast in enough swing states, the movie says, to overturn the 2020 election.