WATCH: Trump levels ‘third-rate reporter’ Jonathan Karl

The president didn't hold any punches...

Image Credit: Shutterstock

President Donald Trump hammered Jonathan Karl, chief White House correspondent for ABC News, after the reporter failed to note that a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) inspector general report suggesting hospitals were short on coronavirus tests was produced by an Obama-era official.

The president seemed to suggest HHS Principal Deputy Inspector General Christi Grimm may have had a political motivation for the report.

“When was she appointed?” Trump asked. “When was she appointed?” Karl didn’t have the answer at this point, stating: “I’m not sure when she was appointed.”

MORE NEWS: Maxine Waters endorses Biden by saying President Trump is ‘talking about killing young white children’

Disputing the Report

Assistant Secretary for Health Brett Giroir discussed Grimm’s report. He noted flaws due to it being produced very early on in the Trump administration’s handling of the coronavirus. “I don’t know the inspector general, I don’t know that person,” Giroir said.

Do you think the mainstream media is biased?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

“I’ll tell you one thing that I have a problem with: If there was such a problem that she knew about or he knew about on March 23 or 24th, why did I find out about the test from them on the news media at 8 0-clock this morning?” he added. Giroir explained that contrary to Grimm’s report, “testing is really in a good position right now.”

MORE NEWS: SC sheriff co-opts protest, deters looting, and settles protestors

RELATED: Jonathan Karl: CNN’s Jim Acosta Needs to Stop Acting Like Part of the Resistance

Remember how President Trump earlier asked Karl about when Grimm was appointed? Trump asked Karl again: “How long has that person been in government?” Karl’s answer was different this time: “She did serve in the previous administration,” Karl responded. And Trump was less than pleased…

RELATED: Dr. Fauci Slaps Down CNN’s Jim Acosta Attempt To Say Trump’s Coronavirus Response Was Too Slow

Karl and the Resistance

President Trump found the omission of information to be curious at best. “Oh, you didn’t tell me that. Oh, I see,” Trump quipped. “You didn’t tell me that, Jon. You didn’t tell me that she did serve in the previous admin, you mean the Obama Administration. Thank you for telling me that. See, there’s a typical fake news deal.”

Karl insisted that he simply replied to the president’s question about when she was appointed to her current position. “You’re a third rate reporter, and what you just said is a disgrace,” a fuming Trump shot back. “You asked me, you said, ‘sir, she just got appointed.’ Take a look at what you said. Now I said, ‘when did they — when did this person — how long in government?’ Well, it was appointed in the Obama Administration,” he continued. “Thank you very much, Jon. Thank you very much. You will never make it.”

The exchange is rather remarkable since Karl, just days earlier, made news for comments regarding CNN reporter Jim Acosta. “We can be tough, we can call out things that are not true, we can be aggressive in our questioning,” Karl said, “but I don’t think we should act like we are part of the resistance.” Neglecting to mention a negative report has been issued by an Obama-era holdover might qualify as acting in the same manner.

This piece originally appeared in ThePoliticalInsider.com and is used by permission.

Read more at ThePoliticalInsider.com:
Pelosi And Dems Aren’t Happy With Trump’s Choice For Coronavirus Recovery Watchdog
Anyone Still Dumb Enough To Vote Democrat Is Betraying Their Country, Family And Friends
Report: State Rep Claims She’s Going To Hague To Refer POTUS For ‘Crimes Against Humanity’

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.

The Political Insider publishes the authentic conservative voices of political insiders and award-winning contributors who believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Each one is committed to combating the overwhelming liberal bias in today’s media to give you, the reader, the unedited facts on real issues.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.