Kavanaugh May Be Bad News for Planned Parenthood in Two States

Supreme Court's newest justice could provide the decisive vote to bring Kansas, Louisiana cases front and center

Image Credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images & Shutterstock

Two states, Kansas and Louisiana, are awaiting votes on their abortion-related cases by the Supreme Court justices in conference Friday. The cases were originally scheduled for the justices’ first conference of the term at the end of September.

The cases have been rescheduled twice so far, presumably to wait for a ninth justice. With the addition of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court may now have the fourth vote needed to take the cases.

The cases — Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri and Gee v. Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast — ask the same question: Does the Medicaid Act allow individual patients to sue their state in federal court to ensure that they can receive Medicaid benefits from their preferred provider of choice—in these cases, Planned Parenthood? The answer to that question will determine whether states are forced to fund abortion providers under their state Medicaid programs.

Related: Here’s the Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade

These cases are the first chance Kavanaugh will have to weigh in as a justice on an issue impacting abortion. It is well established that states, along with the federal government, are not required to fund elective abortions. But it is far from settled whether states must fund abortion providers for other services that they provide.

In recent years, Planned Parenthood has come under increased public scrutiny and criticism for its dubious business practices after undercover videos appeared to show Planned Parenthood officials haggling over the body parts of aborted fetuses and multiple reports alleging massive fraud, waste, and abuse and unsafe practices of Planned Parenthood affiliates. In the wake of these actions and others, defunding Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers became a priority for the federal government and many states.

Do you think Donald Trump will be indicted?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

For example, earlier this year the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed a rule that to receive Title X family planning funds, there must be clear financial and physical separation between a Title X-funded project and abortion services. And just last week, the full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument on whether Ohio can defund abortion providers under six of its health programs.

Perhaps most notably, there has been a wave of states seeking to defund abortion providers under their state Medicaid programs. HHS is currently reviewing proposals from Texas, Tennessee, and South Carolina, while the defunding decisions by other states — including Kansas and Louisiana — have been challenged in federal court by Planned Parenthood and some of its patients.

Related: Exclusive: Dean Cain on ‘Gosnell’: ‘We Need to Be Aware When Atrocities Like This Take Place’

The federal appeals courts have split on the issue. On one side, the 8th Circuit upheld Arkansas’s right to terminate its Medicaid provider agreement with Planned Parenthood and to successfully curtail state taxpayer dollars to the abortion giant.

The court explained that the Medicaid Act’s terms only allow individuals to choose a “qualified provider,” and under the act, states are given not only great leeway to create their own state Medicaid programs, but also broad authority to determine whether providers are qualified to participate.

On the other side, the 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, and 10th Circuits have all found that the Medicaid Act grants individual patients a right to receive care from any provider who is able and willing to perform the requested services, all on the state’s dime.

Medicaid funds are vital to many women, and states should be free to decide where their own Medicaid dollars are best spent to serve women and their citizens.

Kansas (in the 10th Circuit) and Louisiana (in the 5th Circuit) have asked the Supreme Court to hear their cases. Kansas chose to remove Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri as a qualified Medicaid provider in the state after the abortion provider refused to allow the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to complete an inspection and photograph portions of its facility, as required under state law.

Louisiana disqualified Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast after it failed to report several Medicaid fraud lawsuits that had been filed against it, along with a settlement in which Planned Parenthood, despite disclaiming all liability, paid back more than $4.3 million to federal and state Medicaid programs.

Medicaid funds are vital to many women, and states should be free to decide where their own Medicaid dollars are best spent to serve women and their citizens. Both states determined that giving Planned Parenthood state Medicaid funds was not a wise use of their limited resources and that they could better serve their citizens by reallocating those funds to other comprehensive and preventive health organizations that are run more responsibly and offer a broader range of service.

But without intervention by the Supreme Court, states like Kansas and Louisiana will be forced to continue to provide tax dollars to the nation’s largest abortion business. The court could announce as early as next week whether or not they will hear the case this term.

Rachel Busick is staff counsel at Americans United for Life.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments