President Obama returned from an Asia-Pacific economic summit in Peru Sunday where he fielded a number of questions regarding President-Elect Donald Trump’s trade agenda. President Obama told America’s trading partners not to necessarily expect the president-elect to follow through on his campaign pledges, telling them not to “assume the worst.”
The president said it was important for other countries to “not make immediate judgments.” Instead, he advised them that “how you campaign is not always how you govern.”
Obama certainly appears to have been the same sort of “patsy” that he called George W. Bush.
The various Asia-Pacific nations in attendance, including China and Mexico, have been understandably preoccupied with Donald Trump’s frequently stated concerns regarding both China’s currency manipulation and the shortcomings of NAFTA. It’s interesting, though, that President Obama would suggest to them that presidential campaign rhetoric might be exaggerated or insincere. And that’s because the Obama of the 2008 presidential campaign offered his own tough talk on China’s currency issues, and also criticized NAFTA. He never followed through on his promises.
In April 2008, at a presidential candidates forum held by the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), Obama said:
“China needs our market. Their economy is dependent on exports to the United States. And we have bargaining power … The problem is that, for all the tough talk of George W. Bush, he is a patsy when it comes to negotiating these agreements. And what we need to do is to just be better bargainers, and say, ‘Look, here’s the bottom line, you guys keep on manipulating your currency, we are going to start shutting off access to some of our markets.'”
[lz_ndn video= 31658371]
Similarly, when running neck-and-neck with Hillary Clinton in Ohio during the 2008 primaries, Obama threatened unilateral action on NAFTA, saying that the “hammer of a potential opt-out” provides “leverage” to renegotiate the agreement.
Once comfortably seated in the Oval Office, President Obama did nothing to deliver on those pledges, continuing to allow China to manipulate its currency and declining to renegotiate NAFTA. Now the president is suggesting Trump will do the same.
What’s most unfortunate for the nation, however, is that if President Obama had actually kept his campaign promises on trade, Donald Trump might not need to propose the same course of action eight years later.
It’s ironic that President Obama is now talking down Donald Trump’s rhetoric, though. Obama certainly appears to have been the same sort of “patsy” that he called George W. Bush. President Obama is taking his disingenuous position on trade a step further by now attempting to defuse the potential impact of Trump’s own agenda. As even Obama grasped in 2008, the United States possesses bargaining power when it comes to trade negotiations. And so, not only has President Obama failed to utilize such an advantage during his own presidency, but he’s now preemptively weakening the hand of the incoming president.
In Peru, President Obama essentially gave a belated admission of his own political motivations. But his failure to adequately confront China’s mercantilism has left President-Elect Trump with the task of digging out of an even deeper hole in 2016 than Obama faced in 2008.
Both Obama and Trump were right to campaign on tough trade talk. But the country can scarcely afford another eight years of the vacillation and ineffectiveness that marked the Obama years.
The author of this piece served as a media director various organizations.
Join the Discussion
Comments are currently closed.