I recently watched one of my favorite Cold War thrillers, Fail Safe. Along with The Hunt for Red October and The Bedford Incident, I think they are the best of the lot in that genre.

But only one problem. The film got everything wrong. I have some insight into this, serving for two years on the intelligence staff of a battalion in the Pershing Nuclear Brigade.

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

The movie postulates that a mechanical failure could mistakenly send bombers against the Soviet Union. Impossible due to security features in our nuclear program. It never happened.

But the film not only theorized it was a probability, but that a general nuclear exchange between the US and the Soviets was inevitable. It was the same idiotic argument we hear from today’s gun control fanatics, that the weapons somehow have an independent mind of their own and could launch nuclear missiles or bombers.

Obviously, we never traded nuke strikes with the Russians. The peace at any price types, Hollywood, and various left wing hangers on who predicted we surely would were completely and utterly out to lunch. Armageddon did not come. The doom was avoided. Hollywood never saw that coming because it drank leftist kool-aid.

Because arts and entertainment poodles have little knowledge of the military or national security matters either from study or personal experience, they tend to make stuff up as they go along.

Quick - Do This Before Biden “Fixes” Your Retirement Plan Next …

One of the unintentionally funny examples of this is the movie Annapolis. In this supposed tale of a plebe year at the US Naval Academy, freshman make out with superior rank females, act sullen to upperclassmen, and physically assault other Academy officers. What happens? Nothing. Colleagues of mine who are grads of the Academy scoff at the film. It’s not even filmed on location, as the Navy refused to have anything to do with it. Thus, we get a New York/Hollywood view of military service with the usual bizarre notions attached.

We got the same studious absurdity with Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. This doomsday scenario goes back to the late 60s and early 70s, as cretins like Paul Ehrlich, an Al Gore level climate hysteric before Gore, predicted all sorts of ecological calamities that were supposed to happen post haste. Over population, lack of water, famine in the West, melting ice caps (he got there before Gore), and a plethora of other climate disasters were inevitable, we were told, unless we mended out evil capitalist ways. Did any of Ehrlich’s prognostications come true? No. Gore’s? Nope.

Who Is A Bigger Threat To America?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

The failed doomsayers are consistently wrong, just as the climate agitators today, because they fail to factor in technological and free market innovation. Also, they just lie to increase the drama, focus the attention, and leverage their access to government power. So before we listen to current day leftist climate doomsayers, we need to remember their track record when it comes to that matter and other issues. When we objectively do, we will find them totally lacking in even the slightest credibility.