Does Ketanji Brown Jackson look up at the sky in the morning and say to herself, “I wonder what is that blue thing above the trees?”

Does she see a cat and theorize, “Is that a car? No, maybe it’s a microwave oven.” Apparently so, as she can’t even define her own sex. Gregg Gutfeld makes merry at her expense.

Close

Gutfeld: The Supreme Court hearings gave us one priceless nugget.

SEN. MARSHA BLACKBURN: Can you provide a definition for the word woman?

JUDGE JACKSON: Can I provide a definition?

BLACKBURN: Yeah.

JACKSON: I can’t.

BLACKBURN: You can’t?

JACKSON: Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.

Who do you think would win the Presidency?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

That shouldn’t be a tough question to answer. If someone asked me, “Hey, Greg, what is a woman?” I’d just show him a picture of Jessica Rabbit. Yeah, she still makes me tingle in all the wrong places.

But why was it so hard for a judge to answer this question? Because we’ve let the woke take the clearest distinctions in life and destroy it? And now people are terrified of facts. It’s part of the Left’s trifecta: Create victims, create new reasons to call people bigots, and give college professors something to waste time on. USA Today came to Jackson’s defense, but totally screwed it up by using nothing but gender studies scholars.

Yes, there are scholars in gender studies. That’s like being a tall munchkin. In the health and wellness section, ironically, the headline reads: “Marsha Blackburn Asked Kentanji Brown Jackson to Define ‘Woman.’ Science Says There’s No Simple Answer.”

Yeah, the same folks who came up with the phrase “follow the science” then ignored their own advice when it doesn’t benefit their politics. So I guess we can’t call Jackson the first black woman Supreme Court justice because according to them, she might not be a woman.

But in reality, what is female has been a simple question for the 300,000 years humans have existed. It’s only in the last decade that idiots have turned it into a trick question on a biology test.

And why? Because they prefer ideology over biology, so there’s no way to clearly define what makes someone a woman. Well, I got an idea to put this debate to rest. Ask 100 men off the street. They’ll define a woman as a human being who has a nurturing side, who could be emotionally strong as a bull, who will always have your back forever, and maybe the most beautiful creatures on Earth, but who can’t parallel park — a sexist would say.

But this is where USA Today screwed up. They interviewed only gender studies experts on questions of biology. That’s like interviewing Dana Perino on death metal. And they all said Jackson was wrong to even cite biology. You thought Jackson was woke? When it comes to defining a woman compared to these zombies, she’s Andrew Dice Clay…

If sex is just a social thing, you can do or say almost anything. That way, a fact changes from what is to what people say it is, and biology, which is based in absolutes, is as unwelcome as Katie Pavlich at a PETA rally. Gender studies is like astrology. With astrology, you look up to the skies and make up stuff. With gender studies, you look down in the locker room and then deny reality. Again, it’s not biology — it’s ideology, which means a female could go her whole life without being female because she didn’t obey the doctrines of gender studies graduates. That’s intellectual fascism, not biology.