Yoel Roth, the Head of Site Integrity for Twitter, tweeted several fact-less statements, including accusations that there are “actual Nazis in the White House.”

The social media company has come under increased scrutiny after they placed a fact-checking label on a tweet by President Donald Trump opining on vote-by-mail fraud.

Twitter countered that President Trump’s fraud claims are untrue, despite ample evidence to the contrary. Roth’s role in that particular label can not be determined specifically, though as head of “integrity,” he must play a large part in how Twitter decides to censor certain political viewpoints.

Roth’s Own Fake News

If the president of the United States can be fact-checked for an opinion that mail-in ballots will lead to fraud —with supporting evidence from experts— then Roth might want to consider self-labeling his own fake news tweets. “Yes, that person in the pink hat is clearly a bigger threat to your brand of feminism than ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” he wrote in response to a rift amongst feminists at the Women’s March in 2017.

There’s been more proof of ballot fraud in the past 24 hours than there has ever been of someone identifying as a Nazi in the White House. Does Twitter plan on adding a label on this tweet?

Repeat Offender Roth

Do you think Twitter censors conservatives?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

This wasn’t the only time that Roth, a melodramatic Hillary supporter now in charge of integrity, compared the Trump administration to Nazis. He specifically compared White House adviser Kellyanne Conway to Joseph Goebbels. “‘Today on Meet The Press, we’re speaking with Joseph Goebbels about the first 100 days’ … What I hear whenever Kellyanne is on a news show,” he tweeted.

Roth has also called the president a “racist tangerine,” yet another false statement as he is neither racist nor a citrus fruit.

Conway blasted Roth on Wednesday. “This guy is constantly attacking Trump voters, Trump, Mitch McConnell, you name it. He’s the head of integrity at Twitter,” she railed. “It’s horrible the way he looks at people who should otherwise have a free and clear platform on Twitter.”

Twitter responded to the controversy by pointing the finger at others rather than admitting Roth might not be a solid selection for the integrity team. “No one person here is responsible for our policies or enforcement actions,” Twitter communications VP Brandon Borrman stated, seemingly unaware of what “Head” means in “Head of Site Integrity.”

“People who decide to target one person for decisions they don’t agree with know damn well what they’re doing,” he wrote, knowing damn well he was pretending everybody else on the team is a straight arrow.

This piece originally appeared in ThePoliticalInsider.com and is used by permission.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.