Pamela Karlan, a Stanford Law School professor and one of the star witnesses for Democrats at Wednesday’s House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry, was once so triggered by President Donald Trump that she couldn’t bear to walk past a hotel featuring his name.

Karlan told her traumatic story to a captive audience at a 2017 American Constitution Society event.

Close

“I came in from the airport yesterday and I got off the bus from Dulles, down at L’Enfant Plaza, and I walked up to the hotel and … I was walking past what used to be the old post office building and is now Trump hotel,” Karlan relayed.

“I had to cross the street, of course.”

When a colleague on the panel asked, “Are you staying there?” Karlan replied, “God, no! Never!”

Excellent work, Democrats.

That’s just what you want from a witness when trying to convince the American people that the impeachment hearings aren’t a sham — somebody who can’t even (or won’t) bring herself to walk past a building with a particular name on it.

Simply listening to this individual’s testimony on Wednesday, coupled with the delicate snowflake story of being unable to walk past a Trump hotel because she hates him so much, is enough to indicate one thing.

Democrats chose the most biased individuals they could possibly think of to further the impeachment sham.

Who do you think would win the Presidency?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Karlan revealed her extreme bias throughout the hearing. But she truly raised the ire of the Trump family when she chose to invoke the name of president’s youngest child, Barron Trump.

Related: First Lady Slams Biased Pamela Karlan

“The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron,” she explained, drawing laughter from some Democrats at the hearing and befuddlement from the rest of America’s viewers — who were trying to figure out the nonsense that just poured out of her mouth.

It took first lady Melania Trump no time at all to post a rare tweet, completely eviscerating Karlan for her antics.

While Democrats were parading faux “expert witnesses,” Republicans were able to call but one witness of their own, liberal law professor Jonathan Turley of George Washington University in D.C.

Turley showed the panel what it’s like to have a serious and credible witness speak about the facts at hand.

During his testimony, Turley slammed Democrats for lowering the bar on impeachment and pursuing an agenda based on anger toward the president.

The contrasts of professionalism were readily apparent, leading LifeZette to declare Turley the “winner” of Wednesday’s testimony and Karlan the clear-cut “loser.”

Using Karlan to try and pull the wool over voters’ eyes is yet another indicator that Democrats will do anything to stop President Trump.

Republican voters need to remember this.

This is true not only for 2020 — but if and when the day actually comes that a Democrat actually captures the White House.

A version of this piece originally appeared in The Political Insider; this article is used by permission.

Read more at ThePoliticalInsider.com:
Hillary Tells Howard Stern She’s Not a Lesbian, Never Had Trouble Getting Boys
Trump Responds to Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page: ‘Go Read Your Lover’s Texts’
Joy Behar Launches Vile Attack on Melania Trump

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.