Politics

Sondland Contradicts Himself Repeatedly in Impeachment Hearings

There were 'no' preconditions, said the ambassador, regarding Trump and Zelensky meetings and situations

Image Credit: Fox News Youtube Screenshot

In often confused and contradictory testimony on Wednesday on Capitol Hill, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland went round and round with GOP Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Republican Counsel Steve Castor during the House Intelligence Committee’s televised impeachment inquiry hearings.

Related: Hearings Up as Sondland Testifies to House Inquiry

Sondland played possum on his knowledge of Burisma until late in the process — and stated ignorance about any aspect of the controversy touching the Bidens until recently.

If such is true, the ambassador’s media and political aides are not earning their pay.

Pressing Sondland on his assertions of a link between a meeting between the two presidents — President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky — and an investigation of Burisma, Castor asked, “Did the president ever tell you about preconditions?”

Sondland admitted, “No.”

Nunes and Castor seem to be trying to isolate presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s communications to Sondland from those of the president. Is the former mayor being made a fall guy for the president?

If so, is this on committee initiative or on orders from the White House?

Related: Gordon Sondland: Five Things You Must Know

Republicans are keying in on a September 9 conversation Sondland had with the president.

In the exchange, Sondland asked the president, “What do you want?”

That question was in regard to the Ukraine.

By both presidential recollection and Sondland’s testimony, the president responded, “I want nothing! I want no quid pro quo! I just want Zelensky to do the right thing.”

In a later conversation, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) said the president told him the same thing.

But then, contrary to the president’s vehement and explicit words, Sondland said he “presumed” the president wanted the quid pro quo as allegedly demanded by Giuliani.

Do you care about the impeachment hearings?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

When asked by Castor why he came to this conclusion, Sondland stated, ”I don’t know why.”

In a later duel with Castor regarding a meeting between Sondland and Ukrainian officials, Sondland admitted in his previous testimony, “I was spinning a little bit.”

That line will not help his credibility with the president or GOP committee members.

The rest of the session, before the lunch break, featured Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Democratic counsel combing through Sondland’s statements and focusing on negative statements about Giuliani and the alleged quid pro quo.

For their part, Nunes and the GOP counsel poked holes in Sondland’s glib posturing and seeming contradictions.

After the segment ended, President Trump, speaking on the White House lawn with Marine One spinning up in the background, said of Sondland, “Don’t know him. Seems like a nice guy.”

This directly undercuts Sondland’s view of himself as a close presidential adviser.

It plays, though, into Sondland’s apparent reputation for exaggeration.

The president went on to echo the witness, repeatedly quoting from the ambassador’s testimony on Trump’s words on the Dem alleged quid pro quo: “I want nothing! I want no quid pro quo!”

Share your thoughts on this story.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.

David Kamioner
meet the author

David Kamioner is a veteran of U.S. Army Intelligence; he served with the Pershing Nuclear Brigade and the First Infantry Division. After that, he worked as a political consultant and ran a homeless shelter for veterans in Philadelphia. In addition to writing freelance pieces for LifeZette, he also writes for American Greatness.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.