Brit Hume of Fox News Just Shredded Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s Complaint Against Trump 

'There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is?'

Image Credit: Fox News Screenshot

Thank goodness Brit Hume is still reading that awful rag The Washington Post and paying close attention.

Thanks to him, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony has been shredded into a million little pieces.

Hume was reading through The Post’s piece on Vindman’s testimony and the man’s reasons for comimg forward.

MORE NEWS: President Trump reflects on Memorial Day with powerful speech: ‘Together we will vanquish the virus and America will rise’

Turns out Vindman, an unelected official, was “deeply troubled” that President Donald Trump might be “subverting” U.S. foreign policy.

Now, on the surface, we wouldn’t expect those who are left-leaning to have any concern with that comment — if anything, they’d likely cheer on Vindman as a “patriot.”

When do you think the country should re-open and get back to work?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Related: Chaos Breaks Out on ‘The View,’ Sparked by Vindman’s Testimony

However, those of us who have more than ankle-deep knowledge of politics and understand how our government operates realize that the comment is a game-changer.

Brit Hume knows — which is why he wrote on Twitter, “There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is?”

MORE NEWS: Ilhan Omar believes Tara Reade on rape charges, still plans to vote for Biden

The fallacy of Vindman’s concern is that President Trump, as the head of the executive branch of government, is the person who sets U.S. foreign policy.

That’s the job of the United States president — to set foreign policy — so how on earth could he be subverting his own agenda?

Spoiler alert: He can’t. 

Unless, of course, Vindman was not talking about Trump’s agenda, but instead was referring to the agenda of the deep state, a group that is likely furious their “foreign policy” is being subverted.

This gotcha moment, which The Blaze pointed out as well, shows Vindman is nothing more than a deep state stooge, in my opinion.

Twitter users were quick to chime in and comment on Hume’s important find.

“Can I have the President decides U.S. Foreign Policy for #100, Alex?” someone wrote.

“A president doesn’t subvert his own policy, he sets it and the doofus was supposed to carry it out!” said another.

“President Vindman’s Ukraine policy was subverted by some elected guy in the Oval Office?” another person wrote on Twitter.

“POTUS determines said foreign policy, not lt. colonels,” said still someone else.

And there were still more comments.

Among them: “Trump ‘is’ America’s foreign policy.”

“The fallacy is that the president sets U.S. foreign policy. He can’t subvert it. It’s not possible.”

“How can the president subvert his own policy? If POTUS sets it, then only a different person could subvert it.”

Share your thoughts.

A version of this piece originally appeared in WayneDupree.com; this article is used by permission.

Read more at WayneDupree.com:
Report: Lieutenant Colonel Who Worked with Schiff Witness Vindman Says He Verbally Reprimanded Him for ‘Bashing America’
Petition to Impeach Nancy Pelosi for Treason Surges Past Quarter-Million Mark
After Backlash Lindsey Graham Will Hand Judiciary Chair Back to Chuck Grassley

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.

meet the author

Wayne Dupree is owner and founder of WayneDupree.com. He was named to 2017 Newsmax’s 50 Most Influential African-American Republicans. He served in the USAF from 1987-1995; he saw time in Operation Desert Storm/Shield. The father of three, he's the host of "The Wayne Dupree Show."

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.