Officials in San Francisco have voted to spend close to a million dollars to paint over a Depression-era mural.
The reasoning and faulty logic sounds familiar to most conservatives: The picture includes slaves and Indians laboring for colonists and George Washington, and celebrates colonialism, slavery, and white supremacy and thus should be erased.
But the counter-arguments are particularly persuasive in this case.
This is not Confederate statues that are used as symbols of white supremacy but George Washington, the founder of our country.
Liberals are banning art, books, music, statues. I seem to recall some other folks who did that in the 1930's. #FoxNation #StarnesCountry https://t.co/9WV2CxJcjr
— toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) July 9, 2019
San Francisco will spend up to $600,000 to paint over a New Deal-era mural that depicts George Washington as a soldier, surveyor and statesman and shows white pioneers standing over the body of a Native American and slaves working at Mount Vernon. https://t.co/PCNkpgsywz
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) July 5, 2019
San Francisco votes to paint over "racist" mural of George Washington, and spend up to $600k to do it! pic.twitter.com/t2hSgEOCUT
— Fox & Friends First (@FoxFriendsFirst) July 5, 2019
Nearly 400 writers and academics are protesting the planned destruction of a controversial mural depicting the life of George Washington: https://t.co/PgrzNiqBCJ pic.twitter.com/Zim1EUruVP
— artnet (@artnet) July 8, 2019
The “Life of Washington” was painted by Victor Arnautoff 83 years ago, so it is from a famous and respected artist.
His work was controversial at the time because his inclusion of slaves and Native-Americans was a subtle critique of American history.
It praised George Washington and America’s founding but reminded anybody who looked at it that it was based in part on conquest and slavery. Much like the streets at West Point that were named after Confederates in the name of reconciliation, the San Francisco officials ignore the intent of this critical piece of art.
They have rather simplistic views of history and feel that anything that disagrees with their current “wokeness” must be purged.
Instead, they have rather simplistic views of history and feel that anything that disagrees with their current “wokeness” must be purged.
But they end up reminding this writer of the Taliban who destroyed Buddhist statues.
Some of these statues were the largest in the world, several thousand years old, and priceless cultural artifacts.
Related: The Confederacy Happened: We Owe It to the Future to Remember the Past
But they were un-Islamic and thus destroyed.
So many people in the West asked how they could do such horrible things to their history, and without a sense of irony, those in San Francisco have answered that question as they vote to remove stunning art and priceless cultural artifact from the past.
Morgan Deane is a former U.S. Marine Corps infantry rifleman. Deane also served in the National Guard as an intelligence analyst. He is the author of the forthcoming book, “Decisive Battles in Chinese History,” as well as “Bleached Bones and Wicked Serpents: Ancient Warfare in the Book of Mormon.” This OpsLens piece is used by permission.
Read more at OpLens:
Medal of Honor Recipients Honored in Netflix Docudrama
Andrew Gillum: Cops Who Draw Guns Have Already Gone Too Far
Politicization of Tragedy: A Go-To Tactic of the Anti-Gun Left
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.