National Security

Democrats Want to Deny Trump’s National Emergency, Yet They Use the Term for Their Own Partisan Purposes

The liberal hypocrisy is hard to miss, notes an opinion piece

Image Credit: NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images/Shutterstock/Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Ever since President Donald Trump declared an emergency over the crisis at the southern border, Democrats have called this “manufactured” and “phony.”

They point to all sorts of things such as the number of illegal crossings and the relative amount of illegal drugs flowing through the border to say there is not a crisis.

But I couldn’t help but think the term is rather selectively used.

In reading The Las Vegas Journal Review, I noticed that trend in two stories on consecutive pages.

The first article on the front page, written by Gary Martin, is titled, “Dems pass rebuke of emergency.”

The first paragraph describes how they seek to rescind his national emergency and how Democrats called the emergency a “false premise.”

Do you support individual military members being able to opt out of getting the COVID vaccine?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

On the next page (literally), I read an article called, “House committee issues subpoenas.”

The issue revolves around the behavior of Trump administration officials over family separations at the southern border.

Related: Trump Declares National Emergency to Secure More Border Funding

The juicy quote comes in the third paragraph when they quote somebody that is driving the news story.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said, “I believe this is a true national emergency.”

What you have is literally back-to-back news stories describing how Democrats vote to deny Trump’s calling the border situation an emergency.

But in the same day and on the next page they talk to reporters, take one issue from the border — unaccompanied minors — and call it an emergency.

The key difference, of course, is that even though the child separation policy was started by former President Barack Obama and was a crisis before Trump became president, it is a convenient moral club with which to beat Trump and call Republicans racist.

Yet the overall crime, lawlessness, human trafficking, and illegal immigration issues seem less important.

Related: House Dems Pass Resolution to Block Trump’s Border Emergency

So politicians will continue to play games on the border crisis — and use words rather selectively for their own partisan gain.

And check out this video:

Morgan Deane, an OpsLens contributor, is a former U.S. Marine Corps infantry rifleman who also served in the National Guard as an intelligence analyst. He is the author of the book “Decisive Battles in Chinese History,” as well as “Bleached Bones and Wicked Serpents: Ancient Warfare in the Book of Mormon.” This OpsLens article is used by permission.

Read more at OpsLens:
UPS Refuses Delivery for Predominantly Muslim ‘No-Go’ Zones
U.S. Shutters Its ‘Palestinian Embassy’
Following Major Hack, California Leads Charge in U.S. Data Regulation

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments