It’s been two years since the end of the Obama presidency and in that span, the mainstream Democratic Party has made an extreme shift to the far Left.
In 2019 the Democrats have put their weight behind increased taxes, universal health care, open borders, and third-trimester abortions.
How do we account for this radical trend?
A journalist friend of mine reports that his generally liberal college son was somewhat somnolent and indifferent during the Obama years, lulled into quiescence by liberal policies and moderate talk. Then came Trump. A huge splash of cold water hit his face and he and his cohorts were galvanized into angry action.
Flannery O’Connor wrote that sometimes you have to “push back against the age as hard as it pushes against you.” Trump pushed hard, and the liberals have become the Left, pushing back even harder.
The problem is that their blind indignation for President Donald Trump is clouding their judgment and pushing them to the brink. They’re punching back at their magnified perception of Trump, not his actual policies.
Trump’s policies are conservative, but mostly traditionally, with a good dash of moderation and compromise.
This isn’t a Newtonian “equal and opposite reaction” by the Democrats. It’s unequal and opposite and may cost them dearly.
Let’s examine the issues.
It’s not a new concept for Democrats to favor higher taxes than Republicans. What is new, however, is the momentum around dramatic tax increases for the super wealthy, which would have a large impact on the economy.
Specifically, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is proposing a 70 percent marginal tax rate on individuals making $10 million a year or more. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is proposing a 2 percent annual tax on citizens with a net worth of over $50 billion.
Currently, the highest tax rate in the U.S. is 37 percent. It was 39.6 percent under Obama.
As it always does, tax increases on the very wealthy will lead to tax increases on the not-so-wealthy and middle class in order to even approach getting the revenues needed for the Left’s hugely expensive schemes.
Building on the socialist momentum from her party, 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) has said she wants to do away with private health insurance in favor of Medicare for All.
Unlike with Obamacare, health insurance companies are not on board here and will fight this tooth and nail.
Now let’s discuss the wall.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) was on record as supporting border and immigration control, including walls and barriers in 2009. Now its chief opponent, he recently tweeted, “The shutdown cost the U.S. economy $11 billion … what a devastating & pointless exercise this has been.”
With an estimated cost of $5 billion dollars, Schumer could have approved the wall, saved $6 billion dollars, avoided a shutdown, and been in line with his party’s stance on immigration reform during the Obama administration.
Related: An ‘Enhanced Barrier’ Is Possible, Says Texas Democrat
So why now the vehement contention? The Democrats care more about sticking it to Trump than common sense.
Apparently, judging from the absence of any explicit policy pronouncements, they believe in neither borders or limits to immigration.
Consider abortion.
In Virginia, embattled Gov. Ralph Northam and other Democrats are supporting the Repeal Act, which would dramatically ease restrictions on third-trimester abortions.
By his own language and subsequently the language of support of other Democrats, this policy would, if enacted, result in the explicit and direct killing of a born child. This isn’t progressive, this is infanticide and murder.
Thankfully the public feels the same way. Only 13 percent of Americans and 18 percent of Democrats favor third-trimester abortions.
These days the billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz are too moderate for these Democrats and they are putting the lie to this New Democrat extremism.
That President Trump has pushed them is indeed true, but they are pushing back much harder and recklessly so.
Schultz called the Medicare for all idea “not American.”
Bloomberg condemned Warren’s proposal, stating: “We need a healthy economy and we shouldn’t be embarrassed about our system. If you want to look at a system that’s not capitalistic, just take a look at what was once one of the wealthiest countries in the world and now people are starving to death: It’s called Venezuela.”
If Democrats want a chance at winning the presidency, they should listen to Schultz and Bloomberg and step back from the cliff.
That President Trump has pushed them is indeed true, but they are pushing back much harder and recklessly so. He has made them so crazy with anger that their fury and policies know no bounds. But in the end, they will hit a wall, maybe not at the border, but of their own making.
William J. Bennett joined Fox News Channel as a contributor in 2017. He is the former U.S. secretary of education under President Ronald Reagan and the nation’s first director of the Office of Drug Control Policy under President George H.W. Bush. This Fox News opinion piece is used by permission.
Read more at Fox News:
Archbishop Calls Bills Repealing Abortion Restrictions ‘Evil’
New Details of 2016 Meeting with Trump Dossier Author Conflict with Dems’ Timeline
Tyrus Admits Defending Trump Can Be a Challenge
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of LifeZette.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.