Family

What a Surprise: Research Is Biased, Even Flat-Out Wrong, When It Comes to Trump Supporters

Columbia Univ. sociologist reviewed academic studies about those who back the president and found this

Supporters of President Donald Trump are subject to systematic bias in academic research and social surveys — and are routinely and erroneously cast as both ignorant and racist.

This isn’t “merely” the opinion or suspicions of those on the Right — it’s the considered assessment of a Columbia University sociologist.

Musa al-Gharbi, a researcher at the New York City-based university, performed a case study analysis of three examples of bias against Trump supporters, as Campus Reform recently noted.

One instance he looked at was a 2017 Washington Post story titled “Racism Motivated Trump Voters More than Authoritarianism,” by Thomas Wood, a political science instructor at Ohio State University.

The author’s methodological approach was biased and flawed, al-Gharbi found.

“Unfortunately, Wood declined to consider how Trump voters differed from Romney voters … instead focusing on the gap between Democrats and Republicans in 2016, in the service of a conclusion his data do not support,” said al-Gharbi.

Do you think President Biden should be impeached for the crisis in Afghanistan and loss of American lives?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Then comes the real media narrative-buster: “According to Wood’s own data, whites who voted for Trump are perhaps less racist than those who voted for Romney,” he said.

He added that “not only were they less authoritarian than Romney voters, but less racist, too!”

Al-Gharbi said that, indeed, “evidence suggests that the role of race has been widely overblown and misunderstood with respect to Trump’s [2016] victory.”

The researcher told Campus Reform his study was motivated partly by his desire to inform potential Trump opposition in the next election; but he is also a proponent of intellectual honesty.

“I also take umbrage at the villainization of Trump supporters,” he said, pointing out that he “grew up in a conservative, religious, military community in Arizona along the United States and Mexico border.”

“Evidence suggests that the role of race has been widely overblown and misunderstood with respect to Trump’s victory.”

Refreshing: This researcher isn’t afraid of what an honest study of the available facts might reveal.

“Trump voters aren’t some mysterious exotic demonic force for me. They are my family, childhood friends, former co-workers, etc.,” he said. “Given this background, I strongly suspected that the cartoonish version of these voters was likely not going to be well-supported by any kind of more even-handed analysis of the available data.”

Related: Here Are the Protesters the Mainstream Media Won’t Ever Show You

Al-Gharbi recommended that academic institutions and media outlets hire fact-checkers with opposing viewpoints to keep content informed, balanced, and honest — this seems a novel idea today.

“Basically everyone in these institutions hates the president and [is] willing — eager, even — to believe the worst about his supporters,” he said.

For more on this topic, check out this video:

(photo credit, article image: Donald Trump Supporters, CC BY-SA 2.0, by Gage Skidmore)

meet the author

Kyle Becker is a content writer and producer with LifeZette.

Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments