A Muslim extremist bent on hatred of the West plowed a rented pickup truck into a group of pedestrians in Manhattan. So, naturally, New York’s leading politicians reacted by calling for more restrictive gun laws.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio spoke about the issue Wednesday at a news conference to update the public about Tuesday’s attack.

[lz_jwplayer video=vMpQRNpV]

“There’s a much bigger conversation we could have about gun safety,” he said. “The NYPD has always vigorously believed that we need to keep guns out of this city and that gun safety laws are here to protect us and protect our officers.”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo echoed de Blasio’s comments and praised the 2013 passage of the Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act, which prohibits certain kinds of firearms defined as “assault weapons,” limits the size of high-capacity magazines, and requires criminal background checks for people buying ammunition.

“As far as gun laws, I am increasingly proud that New York State passed some of the smartest gun laws in the country, the SAFE Act,” he said at the news conference. “I think it is madness the number of assault weapons that we have in this country. I think that it endangers law enforcement. I think that it costs us untold numbers of deaths. And I hope that one day we’ll have a federal policy that actually brings sanity to the gun policy laws in this country.”

The comments may strike some as strange, since the attacker who killed eight people on Tuesday, Sayfullo Saipov, used a vehicle to do it, not a gun.

But Larry Pratt, executive director emeritus of Gun Owners of America, noted that former New York City Mayor David Dinkins once used a knife attack as justification for gun control.

“That’s what New York City mayors do,” he told LifeZette. “It does illustrate a continuation of a default reaction by New York City politicians, from Dinkins to de Blasio … They have a real fear of an armed populace.”

De Blasio also said he favored “vetting” of people coming into the United States, as long as it does not involve where they are coming from or what their religious beliefs are.

Who do you think would win the Presidency?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

“I can say simply, we support vetting of individuals. We support thorough vetting, not of groups of people just because they belong to a group,” he said. “We think that this is a very crucial distinction. There should be very, very careful vetting of anyone where there’s an indication of a concern. But not because of their religion. Not because of their country of origin.”

Kyle Shideler, director of the threat assessment office of the Center for Security Policy, said it makes no sense to treat immigrants the same regardless of what countries they are coming from.

[lz_related_box id=”857922″]

“We know that there are major jihadist elements of work in a number of countries … We are going to be concerned about some countries more than others,” he said.

Shideler said political correctness led de Blasio to curtail the New York City Police Department’s efforts to monitor extremist mosques and individuals.

“Mayor de Blasio’s approach to this entire problem is nonsensical,” he said.

(photo credit, homepage image: Bill DeBlasio, CC BY-SA 4.0, by Thomas Good, NLN / Gov. Cuomo…, CC BY 2.0, byMetropolitan Transportation Authority of the State of New York; photo credit, article image: NLN Bill DeBlasio, mirrored, CC BY-SA 4.0, by Thomas Good, NLN / Governor Cuomo’s Major Agenda ProposalCC BY 2.0, by Metropolitan Transportation Authority of the State of New York)