Former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Andrew McCarthy said it was “totally unnecessary” for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the Russia probe, during an interview Monday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.”

McCarthy, a contributing editor for National Review, argued President Donald Trump and his administration “wouldn’t have the mess that we have now” if Sessions had refused to cave into Democrats’ demands and opted to stick with the investigation into 2016 election meddling. If Sessions hadn’t bowed out, McCarthy said, Trump may have had no reason to fire former FBI Director James Comey and find himself embroiled in talk of impeachment for obstruction of justice.

“It was totally unnecessary, if you look at the regulation that [Sessions] says that he relied on, because that regulation refers to criminal investigations. There was no criminal investigation here. It’s a counterintelligence investigation, just an information-gathering investigation,” McCarthy noted.

[lz_ndn video=”32571721″]

The consequences of Sessions recusal were sweeping and may have a lasting impact on the Trump presidency, McCarthy said.

“The … most damaging thing that happen[ed] here was Comey’s testimony on March 20, which was totally inappropriate in about 15 ways,” McCarthy said. “But I don’t think Sessions, if he hadn’t been recused, would ever let Comey give that testimony, which publicly said not only that there was an investigation of Russian meddling but that they were looking specifically at Trump campaign collusion with Russia, and that they were also considering or would consider whether criminal charges were appropriate.”

“I don’t think Sessions would have ever let that happen,” McCarthy added. “I think if it hadn’t happened, Trump probably would not have had reason to fire Comey and probably we wouldn’t have the mess that we have now.”

McCarthy added, “Here we’ve had an attorney general who let himself basically get steamrolled by career people to recuse himself, to be above reproach, and I think in a really hyper and unnecessary way. This goes to show there’s no point in settling with Washington because you’re going to be reproached anyway.”

The former assistant U.S. attorney bemoaned the “painful” interviews that Trump attorney Jay Sekulow gave on the Sunday morning shows, in which he downplayed a tweet from Trump in which the president said “I am under investigation.” Claiming Trump was merely responding to an anonymously sourced Washington Post article, Sekulow insisted the president was not, in fact, under investigation.

“Look at this insane, stupid discussion we’ve had the whole weekend about whether he’s under investigation, which is, like, irrelevant, whether he is or not,” McCarthy said of Trump. “But we’ve argued it because he tweeted something about it, so that’s been what the whole weekend was about.”

Who do you think would win the Presidency?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

McCarthy also expressed his disappointment with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and his appointment of a special counsel to investigate Trump following the abrupt Comey firing.

“[Rosenstein’s] a guy I think who has very carefully cultivated relations with both sides of the aisle,” McCarthy said. “It’s like a typical Washington type, right? And he was not going to be comfortable being the guy who was put out there” on the hot seat. (go to page 2 to continue reading)[lz_pagination]